gbrain.ioYC P26 landing page report.
← Back to YC P26
gbrain.iohttps://gbrain.io/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How gbrain.io ranks

  1. 1.Lindy79
  2. 2.gbrain.io74
  3. 3.Dust66
  4. 4.MultiOn (Please AI)61
  5. 5.Manus56
Fix Trust
74Growth scoreupdated

category scores

Trust48CTA74Information hierarchy76Value props82Mobile web88
category scoresShowHide
Trust48CTA74Information hierarchy76Value props82Mobile web88

Score over time

908070605040Lindy 79 on Jul 17 (Live)Lindy 82 on Aug 20 (Wayback)Lindy 78 on Aug 28 (Wayback)Lindy 81 on Sep 17 (Wayback)Dust 65 on May 5 (Wayback)Dust 62 on May 21 (Wayback)Dust 62 on Jul 6 (Wayback)Dust 66 on Jul 17 (Live)Dust 63 on Aug 5 (Wayback)Dust 62 on Aug 29 (Wayback)Dust 58 on Oct 3 (Wayback)Manus 54 on Apr 17 (Wayback)Manus 55 on May 28 (Wayback)Manus 57 on Jun 11 (Wayback)Manus 58 on Jun 25 (Wayback)Manus 48 on Jul 8 (Wayback)Manus 47 on Jul 24 (Wayback)Manus 56 on Jul 27 (Live)MultiOn (Please AI) 61 on Sep 4 (Live)gbrain.io 64 on May 6 (Wayback)gbrain.io 64 on Jul 20 (Wayback)gbrain.io 67 on Sep 17 (Wayback)gbrain.io 74 on Sep 20 (Live)May 6Jul 20Sep 17Sep 20
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 20, 202674LiveOverall +7 · Mobile web +16 · Value props +10Viewing
  2. Sep 17, 202667Overall +3 · CTA +10 · Trust +8View →
  3. Jul 20, 202664Value props +20 · Mobile web −16View →
  4. May 6, 202664First tracked report — strongest Information hierarchy 88, weakest Trust 34View →

Trust

48Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

gbrain.io
Lindy
Manus
Trust read
gbrain.io"Backed by Y Combinator" badge under the CTA
LindyG2 badge with 4.9 star rating below the "Try for free" CTA
DustNo visible trust signal identified.
ManusBanner: "Manus is now part of Meta — bringing AI to businesses worldwide"
MultiOn (Please AI)"#1 ranked action AI on AndroidWorld" claim below the CTA

CTA

74Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

gbrain.io
Lindy
Manusin-product action

Problems

  • generic label, no headline echo
  • casing differs from nav button
  • no offer/value hint in copy

Information hierarchy

76Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Duplicate Get Started CTA — Navbar 'Get Started' mirrors the hero button at similar weight, splitting the single-action focus.
  2. Hero CTA contrast — Muted periwinkle button with dark text sits low-contrast against the dark hero, slowing the one-second find.
  3. Nav link cluster — Features, Skills, Pricing, About offer four exits before the visitor reaches the pitch.

Value props

82Strong

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

gbrain.io’s headline sellsA personal assistant that works while you sleepLike ChatGPT or Claude, but it runs in the cloud, remembers everything you give it, and comes loaded with skills. Hand it a job tonight and read the answer in the morning. Use it on your own, or with your whole team.

Working

  • Outcome-led headline with emotional hook
  • Anchors to ChatGPT/Claude for instant clarity
  • "Job tonight, answer in the morning" is vivid

Could improve

  • "Loaded with skills" is vague — name them
  • Hero art is a metaphor, not a product demo
  • No numbers or proof points beyond YC badge

Mobile web

88Strong

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture1
  1. Trust badge row — "Backed by YC / Built by Garry Tan" overlaps the busy robot imagery, hurting legibility.

Competitors

inferred from product, audience, and value prop
#1Lindylindy.ai79
#2gbrain.io74
#3Dustdust.tt66 #4MultiOn (Please AI)multion.ai61 #5Manusmanus.im56