Avea RoboticsYC P26 landing page report.
← Back to YC P26

Score over time

90807060504030Formant 49 on Feb 18 (Wayback)Formant 48 on Mar 15 (Wayback)Formant 45 on Apr 12 (Wayback)Formant 65 on Apr 22 (Wayback)Formant 44 on May 8 (Wayback)Formant 43 on May 22 (Wayback)Formant 65 on Jul 28 (Live)Foxglove 75 on Mar 22 (Wayback)Foxglove 73 on Apr 2 (Wayback)Foxglove 72 on Apr 12 (Wayback)Foxglove 73 on May 4 (Wayback)Foxglove 72 on May 12 (Wayback)Foxglove 71 on Jul 1 (Wayback)Foxglove 73 on Jul 28 (Live)Transitive Robotics 61 on May 13 (Wayback)Transitive Robotics 64 on Sep 20 (Live)InOrbit 47 on Feb 15 (Wayback)InOrbit 48 on Mar 8 (Wayback)InOrbit 44 on Apr 12 (Wayback)InOrbit 45 on Apr 22 (Wayback)InOrbit 45 on May 11 (Wayback)InOrbit 43 on Jul 19 (Wayback)InOrbit 55 on Jul 28 (Live)Scalable Robotics / Ottometric alternative — Anybotics is hardware, so instead: 70 on Mar 12 (Wayback)Scalable Robotics / Ottometric alternative — Anybotics is hardware, so instead: 77 on Jul 28 (Live)Avea Robotics 74 on Sep 2 (Wayback)Avea Robotics 72 on Sep 20 (Live)Sep 2Sep 20
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 20, 202672LiveOverall −2 · Trust −10 · CTA +6Viewing
  2. Sep 2, 202674First tracked report — strongest Information hierarchy 82, weakest Trust 58View →

Trust

48Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Trust read
Avea RoboticsNo visible trust signal identified.
FormantNo visible trust signal identified.
FoxgloveHero photo of a real robotic-arm workcell with the platform visible on a monitor
Transitive RoboticsNo visible trust signal identified.
InOrbitHero top-down warehouse visualization showing robots and orchestration routing paths
Scalable Robotics / Ottometric alternative — Anybotics is hardware, so instead: No visible trust signal identified.

Value props

72Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Avea Robotics’s headline sellsThe ops platform for robot deployments.Remotely operate, monitor, recover, and improve robots in the real world — from the first teleoperation demo to fleet-scale supervised autonomy.

Working

  • Clear category + audience in six words
  • Subhead names four concrete jobs
  • Hero video shows live teleop, not decor

Could improve

  • Zero numbers or proof points in fold
  • No emotional hook (stuck-robot pain)
  • "Improve robots" is vague vs. the rest

Information hierarchy

78Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Duplicate free-trial CTAs — "Try it for free" appears in both nav and hero at similar weight, splitting the click target instead of reinforcing one.
  2. Watch Sentinel button — Outlined secondary CTA sits at nearly the same size and weight as the primary, forcing a choice at the decision point.
  3. Headline over video — "robot deployments." in lavender sits on busy mid-tone video frames, dropping contrast right where the promise lands.

Mobile web

78Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Try it for free — Primary CTA is desktop-proportioned at half column width instead of a full-bleed thumb target.
  2. Body copy over video — Subheadline sits on bright video UI panels, hurting contrast and legibility.
  3. Duplicate header CTA — "Try it for free" repeats in the header inches above the hero CTA, competing for the same tap.

CTA

84Strong

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Avea Robotics

Problems

  • 4 words, over 3-word ideal
  • smaller than secondary CTA on desktop
  • filler word 'it' adds no meaning