VybeYC P25 landing page report.
← Back to YC P25

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

Fix Trust

Score over time

908070605040Lindy 79 on Jul 17 (Live)Lindy 82 on Aug 20 (Wayback)Lindy 78 on Aug 28 (Wayback)Lindy 81 on Sep 17 (Wayback)Relevance AI 64 on Apr 12 (Wayback)Relevance AI 66 on Apr 21 (Wayback)Relevance AI 69 on May 7 (Wayback)Relevance AI 72 on May 19 (Wayback)Relevance AI 70 on Jun 2 (Wayback)Relevance AI 71 on Jun 18 (Wayback)Relevance AI 70 on Jul 28 (Live)Dust 65 on May 5 (Wayback)Dust 62 on May 21 (Wayback)Dust 62 on Jul 6 (Wayback)Dust 66 on Jul 17 (Live)Dust 63 on Aug 5 (Wayback)Dust 62 on Aug 29 (Wayback)Dust 58 on Oct 3 (Wayback)Artisan 74 on May 1 (Wayback)Artisan 76 on Sep 20 (Live)MindStudio 52 on Jun 1 (Wayback)MindStudio 54 on Jun 12 (Wayback)MindStudio 52 on Jun 23 (Wayback)MindStudio 53 on Jul 4 (Wayback)MindStudio 51 on Aug 3 (Wayback)MindStudio 52 on Sep 4 (Wayback)MindStudio 54 on Sep 20 (Live)Vybe 70 on May 3 (Wayback)Vybe 63 on Jul 8 (Wayback)Vybe 64 on Jul 21 (Wayback)Vybe 68 on Sep 21 (Live)May 3Jul 8Jul 21Sep 21
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 21, 202668LiveOverall +4 · Trust +10 · Value props +6Viewing
  2. Jul 21, 202664Overall +1 · Value props +4View →
  3. Jul 8, 202663Overall −7 · Value props −26 · CTA −10View →
  4. May 3, 202670First tracked report — strongest Information hierarchy 78, weakest Trust 42View →

Trust

52Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Artisan
Lindy
Trust read
VybeNo visible trust signal identified.
LindyG2 badge with 4.9 star rating below the "Try for free" CTA
Relevance AINo visible trust signal identified.
DustNo visible trust signal identified.
Artisan"SOC 2 Type II" and "GDPR" compliance badges with "Integrates with Salesforce and HubSpot" directly beneath the Get star
MindStudioEmbedded "Introducing Remy" product demo video in the hero

Value props

62Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Vybe’s headline vagueBecome an AI-native companyConnect your tools to AI coworkers and custom apps that run every team's operations.

Working

  • Subhead names mechanism and scope
  • Hero demo shows named AI coworkers
  • Use-case tabs ground the claim

Could improve

  • H1 is a buzzword any AI tool could use
  • No numbers or proof points
  • No emotional payoff named

CTA

64Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Vybe
Lindy
Artisan
Dust

Problems

  • 'Request' implies a wait, not value
  • click delivers a form, not product
  • no payoff language in the label

Information hierarchy

76Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture1234
  1. Duplicate Request access — Header 'Request access' repeats the hero CTA at equal visual weight, splitting the click target and adding noise to the scan path.
  2. Announcement banner pill — 'Agents with eyes, artifacts in chat...' sits directly above the headline with its own arrow link, pulling first attention away from the value prop.
  3. Persona use-case tabs — Four tabs (Content Marketing, Customer Success...) between the CTA and the product visual add a decision layer before the demo screenshot can land.
  4. Integration icon columns — Grayscale CRM/AI/Communication icon rows compete with the product screenshot at the same weight, making the lower fold read as two panels shouting at once.

Mobile web

84Strong

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Announcement pill truncated — Copy cuts off at "and th…", so the promoted news never lands on mobile.
  2. Wrapping tab pills — Four tabs break into two uneven rows, reading as clutter instead of a control.
  3. Chat bubble overlap — Floating chat widget covers the Communication card's edge and adds tap friction.