RunRLYC P25 landing page report.
← Back to YC P25
RunRLhttps://runrl.com/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How RunRL ranks

  1. 1.OpenPipe76
  2. 2.Together AI73
  3. 3.Adaptive ML64
  4. 4.RunRL47
Fix Trust
47Growth scoreupdated

category scores

Trust32CTA42Information hierarchy52Mobile web52Value props58
category scoresShowHide
Trust32CTA42Information hierarchy52Mobile web52Value props58

Score over time

8070605040Adaptive ML 61 on Apr 10 (Wayback)Adaptive ML 56 on Apr 22 (Wayback)Adaptive ML 59 on May 4 (Wayback)Adaptive ML 61 on Aug 1 (Wayback)Adaptive ML 64 on Sep 20 (Live)OpenPipe 75 on Apr 12 (Wayback)OpenPipe 76 on Apr 20 (Wayback)OpenPipe 75 on May 24 (Wayback)OpenPipe 75 on Jun 16 (Wayback)OpenPipe 76 on Jun 28 (Wayback)OpenPipe 75 on Jul 28 (Wayback)OpenPipe 76 on Jul 31 (Live)Together AI 73 on May 4 (Wayback)Together AI 73 on May 19 (Wayback)Together AI 73 on May 30 (Wayback)Together AI 73 on Jun 17 (Wayback)Together AI 74 on Jul 2 (Wayback)Together AI 70 on Jul 15 (Wayback)Together AI 73 on Jul 28 (Live)RunRL 64 on Mar 24 (Wayback)RunRL 64 on Apr 14 (Wayback)RunRL 64 on May 16 (Wayback)RunRL 66 on Jun 16 (Wayback)RunRL 47 on Sep 20 (Live)Mar 24Apr 14May 16Jun 16Sep 20
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 20, 202647LiveOverall −19 · CTA −30 · Trust −26Viewing
  2. Jun 16, 202666Overall +2 · CTA +4 · Mobile web +4View →
  3. May 16, 202664Value props +4 · Information hierarchy −2View →
  4. Apr 14, 202664Information hierarchy +6 · Value props −4View →
  5. Mar 24, 202664First tracked report — strongest Mobile web 72, weakest Value props 58View →

Trust

32Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

RunRL
OpenPipe
Together AI
Adaptive ML
Trust read
RunRL"Backed by YCombinator" footer line
Adaptive ML"Adaptive ML has been acquired by Datadog" announcement banner
OpenPipe"Trusted by top companies" logo row featuring Zapier, Y Combinator, Flow, and Method
Together AI"TRUSTED BY" logo strip with Cohere, DeepMind, LG AI Research, VFS.Global, ElevenLabs

CTA

42Poor

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

book a call
RunRL
Together AI
OpenPipe
Adaptive ML

Problems

  • no button — inline text link only
  • call feels costly and committal
  • zero visual footprint on fold
  • two equal links split the action

Information hierarchy

52Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Inline text link CTAs — Primary actions 'email' and 'book a call' are body-text links with no button weight, invisible at a glance.
  2. Footer credibility row — 'Backed by YCombinator' and Promontory sit as low-contrast links; the strongest trust signal reads as an afterthought and adds two exits.
  3. San Francisco link — Outbound link with equal styling to the conversion links, leaking attention for zero conversion value.

Mobile web

52Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture12
  1. Text link CTAs — Primary actions 'email' and 'book a call' are inline text links, not tappable buttons — easy to miss and hard to hit with a thumb.
  2. Three-line wrapped headline — The desktop headline 'RunRL: Reinforcement learning as a service' wraps into three heavy lines and consumes a quarter of the first viewport.

Value props

58Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

RunRL’s headline undersellsRunRL: Reinforcement learning as a serviceWe provide a platform for you to improve your models with reinforcement learning.

Working

  • Instantly clear what the product is
  • Real use cases: drug design, red-teaming
  • No buzzword inflation or overclaim

Could improve

  • No numbers or measurable outcomes
  • Subhead restates the headline
  • No visual showing the product working

Competitors

inferred from product, audience, and value prop
#1OpenPipeopenpipe.ai76 #2Together AItogether.ai73 #3Adaptive MLadaptive-ml.com64
#4RunRL47
—Predibasepredibase.comfailed