PrismYC P25 landing page report.
← Back to YC P25

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

Fix Trust

Score over time

9080706050Together AI 73 on May 4 (Wayback)Together AI 73 on May 19 (Wayback)Together AI 73 on May 30 (Wayback)Together AI 73 on Jun 17 (Wayback)Together AI 74 on Jul 2 (Wayback)Together AI 70 on Jul 15 (Wayback)Together AI 73 on Jul 28 (Live)Fireworks AI 70 on Mar 24 (Wayback)Fireworks AI 73 on Apr 7 (Wayback)Fireworks AI 75 on Apr 20 (Wayback)Fireworks AI 71 on May 19 (Wayback)Fireworks AI 73 on Jun 10 (Wayback)Fireworks AI 79 on Jul 15 (Wayback)Fireworks AI 78 on Jul 28 (Live)Groq 72 on Jun 24 (Wayback)Groq 75 on Jul 10 (Wayback)Groq 76 on Jul 23 (Wayback)Groq 57 on Aug 9 (Wayback)Groq 58 on Aug 19 (Wayback)Groq 56 on Sep 9 (Wayback)Groq 56 on Sep 20 (Live)DeepInfra 62 on Jun 22 (Wayback)DeepInfra 62 on Jul 14 (Wayback)DeepInfra 62 on Jul 28 (Wayback)DeepInfra 63 on Aug 7 (Wayback)DeepInfra 63 on Aug 21 (Wayback)DeepInfra 61 on Sep 4 (Wayback)DeepInfra 68 on Sep 21 (Live)Novita AI 57 on Apr 21 (Wayback)Novita AI 70 on May 19 (Wayback)Novita AI 67 on Jun 6 (Wayback)Novita AI 60 on Jun 16 (Wayback)Novita AI 60 on Jul 8 (Wayback)Novita AI 59 on Aug 3 (Wayback)Novita AI 67 on Sep 22 (Live)Prism 73 on Sep 16 (Wayback)Prism 74 on Sep 22 (Live)Sep 16Sep 22
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 22, 202674LiveOverall +1 · Value props +6 · CTA +4Viewing
  2. Sep 16, 202673First tracked report — strongest Information hierarchy 78, weakest Trust 62View →

Trust

58Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Prism
Together AI
DeepInfra
Trust read
Prism"Backed by Y Combinator" badge above the hero headline
Together AI"TRUSTED BY" logo strip with Cohere, DeepMind, LG AI Research, VFS.Global, ElevenLabs
Fireworks AIimplicit context Fireworks AI may benefit from pre-existing familiarity among its target audience.
GroqGROQ CLOSES $350 MILLION SERIES A banner
DeepInfra"DeepInfra raises $107M Series B to scale the inference cloud" announcement bar
Novita AI"TRUSTED BY" heading peeking at the bottom of the mobile fold

Information hierarchy

76Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture1234
  1. Duplicate Start Building CTA — The hero 'Start Building' repeats the identical nav button, splitting attention across two equal-weight versions of the same action.
  2. Copy setup prompt button — Sits at near-equal size beside the primary CTA, forcing a choice at the decision moment instead of subordinating to it.
  3. Nav link row — Five text links plus 'Book a demo' create six exit paths before the visitor reaches the hero promise.
  4. API response panel — Cropped floating window overlaps the code editor at the fold edge, adding a competing focal point with no readable payoff.

CTA

78Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Prism
Together AI

Problems

  • no cost/free signal on fold
  • mobile input has bare arrow submit
  • payoff of click not stated

Value props

78Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Prism’s headline sellsLightning fast inference optimized for youAccess to DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash, GLM-5.3, Kimi K3, and Qwen3.8 through OpenAI-compatible and Anthropic-compatible APIs.

Working

  • Subhead names exact models on offer
  • OpenAI/Anthropic-compatible = drop-in swap
  • Hero shows real code, not decoration

Could improve

  • No speed number backs 'lightning fast'
  • 'Optimized for Prism' is empty filler
  • No pricing or latency proof in fold

Mobile web

80Strong

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Copy setup prompt button — Same width and near-equal weight as Start Building, splitting the tap decision.
  2. Model tile labels — Monospace names like "DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash" hyphen-break across three cramped lines.
  3. Subheadline model list — Four model names in one sentence wrap into three dense lines that slow scanning.