nao LabsYC P25 landing page report.
← Back to YC P25

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

Fix Trust

Score over time

807570656055Julius AI 66 on Apr 24 (Wayback)Julius AI 67 on Sep 20 (Live)Zenlytic 74 on Apr 2 (Wayback)Zenlytic 73 on May 18 (Wayback)Zenlytic 73 on Jun 17 (Wayback)Zenlytic 72 on Jul 4 (Wayback)Zenlytic 73 on Sep 21 (Live)Fabi.ai 70 on Apr 16 (Wayback)Fabi.ai 60 on Jun 10 (Wayback)Fabi.ai 58 on Jun 24 (Wayback)Fabi.ai 62 on Sep 1 (Wayback)Fabi.ai 60 on Sep 21 (Live)Basejump AI 61 on Apr 4 (Wayback)Basejump AI 63 on Apr 21 (Wayback)Basejump AI 59 on May 13 (Wayback)Basejump AI 61 on Jun 10 (Wayback)Basejump AI 64 on Sep 20 (Live)Wren AI 77 on Feb 12 (Wayback)Wren AI 77 on Feb 26 (Wayback)Wren AI 77 on Mar 8 (Wayback)Wren AI 74 on Jun 5 (Wayback)Wren AI 75 on Jul 26 (Wayback)Wren AI 72 on Jul 28 (Live)nao Labs 72 on Apr 30 (Wayback)nao Labs 72 on Jun 26 (Wayback)nao Labs 71 on Jul 23 (Wayback)nao Labs 73 on Sep 3 (Wayback)nao Labs 74 on Sep 22 (Live)Apr 30Jun 26Jul 23Sep 3Sep 22
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 22, 202674LiveOverall +1 · CTA +4 · Value props +2Viewing
  2. Sep 3, 202673Overall +2 · CTA +4 · Trust +4View →
  3. Jul 23, 202671Overall −1 · Mobile web +6 · CTA −4View →
  4. Jun 26, 202672Mobile web −6 · Trust +4View →
  5. Apr 30, 202672First tracked report — strongest Mobile web 82, weakest Trust 58View →

Trust

62Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

nao Labs
Wren AI
Zenlytic
Trust read
nao LabsProduct demo showing agent steps "Exploring context: warehouse schema, metrics & models…" and "Executing SQL on your war
Julius AILive prompt interface with model selector "Julius 1.2" and capability chips (Browser Agent, Build Website, Video, Image,
Zenlytic"TRUSTED BY" logo wall (Verizon, Chanel, J.Crew, Workday, Domino's, Eaton)
Fabi.aiReal product UI screenshot in the hero showing a data table with plan tiers and a "Watch demo (2 min)" overlay
Basejump AINo visible trust signal identified.
Wren AIGitHub badge: "16,678 — #1 GENBI ON GITHUB"

Value props

68Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

nao Labs’s headline undersellsthe Analytics Agent built for context engineeringBuild your agent context like a file system. Deploy a chat UI for anyone to run analytics on your data.

Working

  • Hero demo shows file tree + chat + chart
  • Subhead states two concrete capabilities
  • 100% Open Source is a clear trust cue

Could improve

  • 'Context engineering' is insider jargon
  • No numbers or quantified outcomes
  • Headline names a method, not a payoff

Information hierarchy

78Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Eight-link navigation bar — Product, Pricing, Services, Users, Docs, Resources plus GitHub give eight exits before the CTA.
  2. Sign in pill — Bordered button weight makes it compete with Get started at the fold's corner.
  3. GitHub 1.7k link — Outbound social-proof link in the nav leaks visitors off-site before conversion.

CTA

80Strong

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

nao Labs
Basejump AI

Problems

  • no 'free' despite open-source offer
  • generic label, no product promise
  • arrow implies leaving to GitHub

Mobile web

82Strong

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture12
  1. Get started button — Desktop-proportioned pill floating at half column width instead of a near-full-bleed thumb target.
  2. Clipped chat screenshot — Chat UI text like "How many users d..." runs off the right edge — the desktop asset was not recomposed for phone width.

Competitors

inferred from product, audience, and value prop