FreesoloYC P25 landing page report.
← Back to YC P25
Freesolohttps://freesolo.co/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How Freesolo ranks

  1. 1.OpenPipe76
  2. 2.Together AI73
  3. 3.Adaptive ML64
  4. 4.Freesolo62
Fix Trust
62Growth scoreupdated

category scores

Trust58CTA62Value props62Mobile web62Information hierarchy64
category scoresShowHide
Trust58CTA62Value props62Mobile web62Information hierarchy64

Score over time

8070605040Adaptive ML 61 on Apr 10 (Wayback)Adaptive ML 56 on Apr 22 (Wayback)Adaptive ML 59 on May 4 (Wayback)Adaptive ML 61 on Aug 1 (Wayback)Adaptive ML 64 on Sep 20 (Live)OpenPipe 75 on Apr 12 (Wayback)OpenPipe 76 on Apr 20 (Wayback)OpenPipe 75 on May 24 (Wayback)OpenPipe 75 on Jun 16 (Wayback)OpenPipe 76 on Jun 28 (Wayback)OpenPipe 75 on Jul 28 (Wayback)OpenPipe 76 on Jul 31 (Live)Together AI 73 on May 4 (Wayback)Together AI 73 on May 19 (Wayback)Together AI 73 on May 30 (Wayback)Together AI 73 on Jun 17 (Wayback)Together AI 74 on Jul 2 (Wayback)Together AI 70 on Jul 15 (Wayback)Together AI 73 on Jul 28 (Live)Freesolo 51 on Apr 15 (Wayback)Freesolo 61 on May 3 (Wayback)Freesolo 65 on Jun 4 (Wayback)Freesolo 62 on Sep 22 (Live)Apr 15May 3Jun 4Sep 22
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 22, 202662LiveOverall −3 · Trust +20 · Information hierarchy −18Viewing
  2. Jun 4, 202665Overall +4 · Trust +10 · Information hierarchy +8View →
  3. May 3, 202661Overall +10 · CTA +30 · Information hierarchy +22View →
  4. Apr 15, 202651First tracked report — strongest Value props 68, weakest Trust 34View →

Trust

58Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Freesolo
OpenPipe
Together AI
Adaptive ML
Trust read
Freesolo"Built with Freesolo" gallery of labeled real product demos (FILTERS, EXPLOITS, REMEMBERS, HARVESTS, PLAYS, TRAINS)
Adaptive ML"Adaptive ML has been acquired by Datadog" announcement banner
OpenPipe"Trusted by top companies" logo row featuring Zapier, Y Combinator, Flow, and Method
Together AI"TRUSTED BY" logo strip with Cohere, DeepMind, LG AI Research, VFS.Global, ElevenLabs

CTA

62Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Freesolo
Together AI
OpenPipe

Problems

  • high-cost sales-call ask
  • no low-friction alternative
  • small footprint vs headline
  • no payoff in the copy

Value props

62Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Freesolo’s headline undersellsThe Full-Stack Platform for Post-TrainingNot every AI interaction is best served by a frontier model. For a long tail of tasks, the intelligence exists, but serving it at acceptable latency and cost doesn’t. Engineers have to choose between model size and quality: as models got sm

Working

  • Names a real, specific category
  • Subhead argues a genuine problem
  • Demo gallery shows the product working

Could improve

  • Buries payoff at end of long essay
  • No numbers or concrete outcomes
  • Headline is positioning, not value

Mobile web

62Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture12
  1. Long intro paragraph — Nine dense lines of desktop prose push the primary CTA below the first viewport.
  2. BOOK A CALL button — Sits below the fold and stays desktop-sized instead of full-width and thumb-friendly.

Information hierarchy

64Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Seven-line intro paragraph — The core promise is buried in the final sentence of an unbroken text wall no scanner will finish.
  2. BOOK A CALL button — Small footprint sitting below the paragraph puts the only CTA outside the one-second scan path.
  3. Demo tile grid — Six equal-weight video tiles compete with the hero and pull the eye past the CTA.

Competitors

inferred from product, audience, and value prop
#1OpenPipeopenpipe.ai76 #2Together AItogether.ai73 #3Adaptive MLadaptive-ml.com64
#4Freesolo62
—Predibasepredibase.comfailed