CuaYC P25 landing page report.
← Back to YC P25

Your landing page’s weakest score is Mobile web.

Fix Mobile web

Score over time

908070605040E2B 80 on May 10 (Wayback)E2B 80 on May 22 (Wayback)E2B 79 on Jun 4 (Wayback)E2B 79 on Jun 16 (Wayback)E2B 79 on Jul 3 (Wayback)E2B 79 on Jul 18 (Wayback)E2B 80 on Jul 31 (Live)Scrapybara 70 on Apr 13 (Wayback)Scrapybara 71 on May 14 (Wayback)Scrapybara 69 on Jun 13 (Wayback)Scrapybara 70 on Jul 10 (Wayback)Scrapybara 70 on Jul 27 (Wayback)Scrapybara 48 on Sep 21 (Live)Browserbase 76 on Apr 4 (Wayback)Browserbase 78 on May 29 (Wayback)Browserbase 78 on Jun 16 (Wayback)Browserbase 73 on Jul 11 (Wayback)Browserbase 71 on Aug 5 (Wayback)Browserbase 71 on Aug 23 (Wayback)Browserbase 76 on Sep 5 (Live)Morph 55 on Sep 20 (Live)Kernel 77 on Sep 21 (Live)Cua 64 on Sep 21 (Live)Sep 21

Mobile web

54Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Hero animation panel — Decorative ASCII-art frame consumes the top half of the fold and pushes the headline and any CTA out of view.
  2. Truncated announcement bar — Banner cuts off mid-sentence ('6 of 25 expert Ki…') with no visible link, leaving a broken message at the top.
  3. /ask input field — The only actionable element sits below the fold and reads as a static code snippet, not a tappable CTA.

Information hierarchy

62Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture1234
  1. Fleets nav button — The only button-styled CTA is a small corner nav item with a vague noun label, invisible in a one-second scan.
  2. /ask input field — Competes with the nav button as the apparent primary action; the fold never signals which one to take.
  3. Navigation link row — Ten-plus links plus a Discord icon outweigh the CTA and leak attention before any conversion.
  4. Cua-Bench banner link — 'VIEW OVERVIEW' pulls first-glance attention to an exit path at the very top of the page.

CTA

62Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Cuain-product action
E2B
Browserbase
Kernel

Problems

  • no submit affordance on input
  • placeholder is Q&A, not product use
  • nav button 'Fleets' is a bare noun
  • no action verb anywhere

Trust

64Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Cua
Kernel
Browserbase
Trust read
Cua"Cua ecosystem integrations" strip with QWEN CODE, NOUS RESEARCH, OPENAI, and "25.1K HUMANS"
E2Bimplicit context E2B may benefit from pre-existing familiarity among its target audience.
ScrapybaraNo visible trust signal identified.
Browserbase"10,000+ companies building beyond the API" with Microsoft, DeepMind, Amplitude, Ramp, Clay, and Lovable logos
Morph"one-click VSCode SSH, tmux automation, live previews, and serverless scale-to-zero" feature copy in the Morph Devboxes
Kernel"loved by 11,000+ teams building agents" above a logo row including Cash App, Vercel, Framer, and Y Combinator

Value props

76Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Cua’s headline sellsScale computer fleets for every agentRun computer-use agent training, eval, and data-generation workloads in parallel on Linux, Windows, macOS, and Android machines. Fork from snapshots, reproduce failures, and turn agent activity into training data.

Working

  • Subhead names 4 OSes and 3 concrete outcomes
  • Cua-Bench banner adds real benchmark proof
  • Integrations strip shows credible ecosystem

Could improve

  • Hero visual is a mascot, not the product working
  • No numbers in headline or subhead
  • Copy is affectless — no pain or relief named