ClarmYC P25 landing page report.
← Back to YC P25

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

Fix Trust

Score over time

9080706050Relevance AI 64 on Apr 12 (Wayback)Relevance AI 66 on Apr 21 (Wayback)Relevance AI 69 on May 7 (Wayback)Relevance AI 72 on May 19 (Wayback)Relevance AI 70 on Jun 2 (Wayback)Relevance AI 71 on Jun 18 (Wayback)Relevance AI 70 on Jul 28 (Live)Lindy 79 on Jul 17 (Live)Lindy 82 on Aug 20 (Wayback)Lindy 78 on Aug 28 (Wayback)Lindy 81 on Sep 17 (Wayback)Dust 65 on May 5 (Wayback)Dust 62 on May 21 (Wayback)Dust 62 on Jul 6 (Wayback)Dust 66 on Jul 17 (Live)Dust 63 on Aug 5 (Wayback)Dust 62 on Aug 29 (Wayback)Dust 58 on Oct 3 (Wayback)Gumloop 75 on May 3 (Wayback)Gumloop 73 on May 16 (Wayback)Gumloop 67 on Jun 14 (Wayback)Gumloop 73 on Jul 16 (Wayback)Gumloop 72 on Aug 11 (Wayback)Gumloop 72 on Sep 20 (Live)StackAI 72 on Apr 2 (Wayback)StackAI 74 on May 27 (Wayback)StackAI 70 on Jul 2 (Wayback)StackAI 65 on Jul 11 (Wayback)StackAI 69 on Aug 5 (Wayback)StackAI 69 on Sep 1 (Wayback)StackAI 70 on Sep 10 (Live)Clarm 70 on Jun 4 (Wayback)Clarm 66 on Jul 8 (Wayback)Clarm 67 on Sep 22 (Live)Jun 4Jul 8Sep 22
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 22, 202667LiveOverall +1 · Information hierarchy +6 · Trust −4Viewing
  2. Jul 8, 202666Overall −4 · Mobile web −10 · Information hierarchy −6View →
  3. Jun 4, 202670First tracked report — strongest Information hierarchy 78, weakest Trust 48View →

Trust

44Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Clarm
Gumloop
StackAI
Lindy
Trust read
Clarm"Backed by Y Combinator" badge above the headline
Relevance AINo visible trust signal identified.
LindyG2 badge with 4.9 star rating below the "Try for free" CTA
DustNo visible trust signal identified.
Gumloop"We raised a $50M Series B led by Benchmark" banner
StackAI"TRUSTED BY" logo strip featuring BAE Systems on the mobile capture

CTA

68Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Clarm
Lindy
Gumloop
StackAI

Problems

  • 'Book' implies a sales call, costly
  • ignores '1 min Clarm's first agent' hook
  • 'pilot' is vendor jargon

Mobile web

70Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture12
  1. Clipped chip row — "Policy training" chip is cut mid-word at the viewport edge with no scroll affordance.
  2. Chat bubble overlay — Floating chat button covers body copy and adds a dead blocker with no conversion value.

Value props

76Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Clarm’s headline sellsBuild an AI coworker for the work your team still does by hand.Clarm Atlas lets non-technical teams build AI coworker agents using building blocks pre-approved by IT and compliance, giving teams the freedom to deploy complete agents straight into production.

Working

  • "still does by hand" hits real pain
  • Names buyer: non-technical teams
  • 1 min / 1 hour / 1 week ladder is concrete

Could improve

  • Hero grid shows nothing about the product
  • Task chips are unexplained labels
  • Subhead is one long 33-word sentence

Information hierarchy

78Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. See how Atlas works — Secondary button matches the primary's size and weight, splitting the fold's one click decision.
  2. Capability pill row — Six equal-weight chips read as a feature index and add a competing message between subhead and CTA.
  3. Wireframe card grid — The hero visual is abstract grey placeholders that communicate nothing about the product's outcome.

Competitors

inferred from product, audience, and value prop