Your landing page’s weakest score is CTA.
How Lyon ranks
- 1.
Lyon54
54Growth scoreupdated
category scores
category scoresShowHide
CTA
32PoorCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?
Problems
- no button or input anywhere
- email is nav text, not an action
- hero space spent on decoration
- no next step after the pitch
Trust
48PoorProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.
| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Lyon | Event-to-embedding demo visualization labeled "EVENTS + PROFILE IN / CUSTOMER EMBEDDINGS OUT" |
Mobile web
58FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.
12- founders@lyon.so link — The only action on the page is a small plain-text email link, not a tappable button.
- Event log visualization — Occupies the lower two-thirds of the fold with no interactive element or action attached.
Information hierarchy
62FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?
12- founders@lyon.so text — The only action on the page is unstyled plain text tucked in the corner, outside the scan path and easy to miss.
- Subtitle block — The argument ends here with no button beneath it — the natural scan path terminates with nothing to click.
Value props
68FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
Lyon’s headline sells
Foundation models on event data
Lyon trains a foundation model from scratch on your customer event data. The model runs in your cloud, and you own the intelligence.
Working
- "Lyon own the intelligence" hits ownership anxiety
- Hero shows events becoming embeddings, not stock art
- Zero buzzwords; every noun is concrete
Could improve
- No business outcome named (churn, fraud, LTV)
- No numbers or proof points anywhere in fold
- Headline assumes reader knows why event FMs matter
Competitors
inferred from product, audience, and value prop#1Lyon54
—