Veria LabsYC F25 landing page report.
← Back to YC F25

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

Fix Trust

Score over time

80706050XBOW 67 on May 13 (Wayback)XBOW 68 on May 29 (Wayback)XBOW 68 on Jun 11 (Wayback)XBOW 76 on Jul 22 (Wayback)XBOW 76 on Aug 19 (Wayback)XBOW 77 on Sep 6 (Wayback)XBOW 72 on Sep 20 (Live)Horizon3.ai (NodeZero) 60 on Jul 4 (Wayback)Horizon3.ai (NodeZero) 61 on Jul 12 (Wayback)Horizon3.ai (NodeZero) 58 on Jul 24 (Wayback)Horizon3.ai (NodeZero) 65 on Aug 12 (Wayback)Horizon3.ai (NodeZero) 67 on Aug 27 (Wayback)Horizon3.ai (NodeZero) 69 on Sep 6 (Wayback)Horizon3.ai (NodeZero) 63 on Sep 21 (Live)Pentera 56 on Apr 6 (Wayback)Pentera 57 on May 5 (Wayback)Pentera 55 on Jun 4 (Wayback)Pentera 58 on Jul 3 (Wayback)Pentera 60 on Aug 14 (Wayback)Pentera 59 on Aug 24 (Wayback)Pentera 61 on Sep 21 (Live)Terra Security 68 on Sep 20 (Live)RunSybil 70 on Apr 23 (Wayback)RunSybil 68 on May 1 (Wayback)RunSybil 70 on May 25 (Wayback)RunSybil 70 on Jun 15 (Wayback)RunSybil 71 on Sep 17 (Wayback)RunSybil 69 on Sep 21 (Live)Veria Labs 76 on Apr 16 (Wayback)Veria Labs 76 on May 3 (Wayback)Veria Labs 68 on Sep 22 (Live)Apr 16May 3Sep 22
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 22, 202668LiveOverall −8 · Trust −28 · Information hierarchy −8Viewing
  2. May 3, 202676Value props −6 · Information hierarchy +4View →
  3. Apr 16, 202676First tracked report — strongest Information hierarchy 82, weakest CTA 68View →

Trust

48Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Veria Labs
XBOW
RunSybil
Pentera
Terra Security
Trust read
Veria Labs"Backed by Y Combinator" badge above the headline
XBOW"150+ security teams trust XBOW to find and prove the flaws attackers would actually exploit"
Horizon3.ai (NodeZero)Video player branded "HORIZON3 — AI-NATIVE PROACTIVE SECURITY" below the hero (visible in the mobile capture)
PenteraGartner Peer Insights Customers' Choice 2026 badge (mobile capture)
Terra SecurityProduct dashboard UI showing "Signals Received 148" and "5 Critical Findings"
RunSybilRunSybil Raises $40M Led by Khosla Ventures

CTA

68Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Veria Labs
RunSybil

Problems

  • 'demo' implies a sales call
  • secondary CTA nearly same size
  • arrow icon suggests leaving page

Value props

68Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Veria Labs’s headline undersellsLeave nothing to chance.Veria AI is an autonomous pentester: it maps your entire attack surface, proves real exploits, and drafts the fix.

Working

  • Subhead names three concrete outcomes
  • 'Proves real exploits' beats scanner claims
  • #1 US hacking team is strong authority proof

Could improve

  • H1 is generic; fits any product
  • No numbers anywhere in the fold
  • Hero art decorates, never demonstrates

Information hierarchy

78Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture12
  1. Read our research button — Secondary CTA sits at nearly the same size and border weight as "Get a demo", splitting the click decision.
  2. Headline placement — "Leave nothing to chance." sits in the bottom-left third, forcing the eye to travel through 500px of empty sky before the message lands.

Mobile web

78Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Get a demo CTA — Sits at the very bottom edge of the fold; a visitor must scroll or stretch to tap it.
  2. Backed by badges — The two proof lines wrap into a stacked block that pushes the headline and CTA lower.
  3. Top nav row — Blog, Sign in, and theme toggle compete as three tap targets instead of collapsing to a menu.