Lua Global IncYC F25 landing page report.
← Back to YC F25
Lua Global Inchttps://heylua.ai/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How Lua Global Inc ranks

  1. 1.Lindy79
  2. 2.Artisan76
  3. 3.Relevance AI70
  4. 4.Lua Global Inc67
  5. 5.Dust66
  6. 6.Sema4.ai63
Fix Trust

Score over time

908070605040Relevance AI 64 on Apr 12 (Wayback)Relevance AI 66 on Apr 21 (Wayback)Relevance AI 69 on May 7 (Wayback)Relevance AI 72 on May 19 (Wayback)Relevance AI 70 on Jun 2 (Wayback)Relevance AI 71 on Jun 18 (Wayback)Relevance AI 70 on Jul 28 (Live)Lindy 79 on Jul 17 (Live)Lindy 82 on Aug 20 (Wayback)Lindy 78 on Aug 28 (Wayback)Lindy 81 on Sep 17 (Wayback)Dust 65 on May 5 (Wayback)Dust 62 on May 21 (Wayback)Dust 62 on Jul 6 (Wayback)Dust 66 on Jul 17 (Live)Dust 63 on Aug 5 (Wayback)Dust 62 on Aug 29 (Wayback)Dust 58 on Oct 3 (Wayback)Sema4.ai 57 on Feb 12 (Wayback)Sema4.ai 58 on Feb 21 (Wayback)Sema4.ai 50 on Mar 28 (Wayback)Sema4.ai 59 on Apr 19 (Wayback)Sema4.ai 60 on May 12 (Wayback)Sema4.ai 63 on Jul 28 (Live)Artisan 74 on May 1 (Wayback)Artisan 76 on Sep 20 (Live)Lua Global Inc 61 on Jun 4 (Wayback)Lua Global Inc 67 on Sep 22 (Live)Jun 4Sep 22
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 22, 202667LiveOverall +6 · Mobile web +24 · Information hierarchy +8Viewing
  2. Jun 4, 202661First tracked report — strongest Information hierarchy 68, weakest Trust 48View →

Trust

48Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Lua Global Inc
Artisan
Lindy
Trust read
Lua Global Inc"Backed by Y Combinator" badge above the headline
Relevance AINo visible trust signal identified.
LindyG2 badge with 4.9 star rating below the "Try for free" CTA
DustNo visible trust signal identified.
Sema4.aiNo visible trust signal identified.
Artisan"SOC 2 Type II" and "GDPR" compliance badges with "Integrates with Salesforce and HubSpot" directly beneath the Get star

Value props

62Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Lua Global Inc’s headline vagueThe AI workforce that companies actually run on.One workspace where people and agents work together — same rooms, same memory, governed on every action.

Working

  • "actually run on" signals anti-hype credibility
  • Subhead names real differentiators: memory, governance
  • YC badge adds early-stage trust

Could improve

  • Hero image is a gradient, shows no product
  • No numbers, outcomes, or customer proof
  • "AI workforce" is a crowded category buzzword

CTA

68Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Lua Global Inc
Lindy
Artisan

Problems

  • demo click feels sales-heavy
  • competing asks: demo vs waitlist
  • nav primary differs from hero primary

Information hierarchy

76Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Duplicate waitlist button — Same size and weight as "Schedule a demo", splitting the primary action; duplicated again in the nav pill.
  2. Nav waitlist pill — Styled as a filled primary button, it competes with the hero CTA pair from the top-right scan position.
  3. Nav dropdown row — Three dropdowns plus Docs and Log in add six exit paths before the visitor reaches the conversion.

Mobile web

82Strong

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture12
  1. Side-by-side CTA pair — Two half-width buttons split the tap target; 'Schedule a demo' should be full-bleed and stacked above the waitlist link.
  2. Oversized hero headline — Headline barely scaled down for mobile and wraps into four tall lines, pushing the CTAs to the bottom edge of the fold.

Competitors

inferred from product, audience, and value prop