Which product archetypes use PLG vs sales-led growth?

Sales-led and cold-outreach growth are concentrated in Enterprise and Collaborative archetypes — Enterprise runs sales-led at 29 of 70 apps (41%) and land-and-expand at 23 of 70 (33%) [1]. Consumer, Social, and Prosumer archetypes lean the mass/self-serve channels: PR, paid, word of mouth, network effects, and PLG [1]. If you are choosing between bottom-up PLG and top-down sales, your archetype largely decides it.

Enterprise apps run sales-led growth at 41% (29/70); Consumer/Social lean PLG and mass channels — July 2026.

Lazyweb Research · n=757 · Published 2026-07-07

saasonboardingux-patternsexperiments

Top growth engines by archetype

Sales-motion engines are archetype-specific [1]:

ArchetypeSales-led (B2B)Cold outreachLand-and-expandPLG
Enterprise (n=70)29282312
Collaborative (n=53)181823
Prosumer (n=118)1342
Consumer (n=546)124
Social (n=260)55

Enterprise and Collaborative are the only archetypes where sales-led, cold outreach, and land-and-expand rank near the top; below the ≥10 co-occurrence threshold in Consumer/Social, they simply don't appear [1].

How to apply it

If you are Enterprise or Collaborative, a sales-led or land-and-expand motion is normal and expected — roughly 4 in 10 Enterprise apps run sales-led [1]. If you are Consumer, Social, or Prosumer, self-serve PLG plus mass channels (PR, paid, word of mouth) is the pattern, and a heavy outbound sales team is off-archetype. Prosumer sits in between — PLG-dominant (42/118) with a small land-and-expand tail (13/118) as individual users pull the product into teams [1].

Caveats

Growth engine x archetype is a cross-tab of two multi-valued tags, so a single company contributes to multiple cells; cells below 10 co-occurrences are omitted (shown as '—'), not zero [1]. Per-archetype denominators run from 546 Consumer down to 53 Collaborative.

The numbers

StatComputed from
29 of 70 (41%)ge_by_archetype: Enterprise Sales-led 29 / n 70
28 of 70ge_by_archetype: Enterprise Cold outreach 28 / n 70
23 of 70 (33%)ge_by_archetype: Enterprise Land-and-expand 23 / n 70
12 of 70ge_by_archetype: Enterprise Product-led self-serve 12 / n 70
18 of 53ge_by_archetype: Collaborative Sales-led 18 / n 53
23 of 53ge_by_archetype: Collaborative Land-and-expand 23 / n 53
42 of 118ge_by_archetype: Prosumer Product-led self-serve 42 / n 118
13 of 118ge_by_archetype: Prosumer Land-and-expand 13 / n 118
124 of 546ge_by_archetype: Consumer Product-led self-serve 124 / n 546
55 of 260ge_by_archetype: Social Product-led self-serve 55 / n 260
Methodology. Universe: the 757 archetype-tagged apps in Lazyweb's ~800-app tracked corpus, July 2026 pull. Method: growth-engine x archetype cross-tab of two multi-valued tags. Caveat: a company appears in multiple cells; cells below 10 co-occurrences omitted (shown as '—').

Sources & citations

  1. [1] Lazyweb Research analysis of 757 archetype-tagged apps (~800-app tracked corpus), July 2026. growth-engine x archetype cross-tab; cells below 10 co-occurrences omitted.

Source: Lazyweb Research — proprietary analysis of real, in-market app screens. Cite as Lazyweb Research, 2026-07-07.

Related questions

Explore the underlying screens, flows, and A/B tests inside Lazyweb. More research