When Do Apps Ask for Your Phone Number vs Email During Signup?

Across 149 signup flows tracked by Lazyweb Research, 76% (113) collect email versus 44% (65) that collect a phone number or OTP[1]. Email is requested earlier — at an average step 3.5, about 54% of the way through the flow — while phone comes later, at step 4.3 (~58% through)[1]. If you need a phone number, expect to ask for it after you have already earned the email.

76% of signup flows collect email vs 44% that collect phone/OTP, and phone is asked later (step 4.3 vs 3.5) — across 149 signup flows, Lazyweb Research, July 2026.

Lazyweb Research · n=149 · Published 2026-07-07

signuponboardingnotificationsux-patternsmobile

The finding

Among 149 signup flows, 113 (75.8%) collect an email address and 65 (43.6%) collect a phone number or OTP[1]. Email is not only more common, it is asked sooner: email lands at an average of step 3.5 (54% through the flow) and phone at step 4.3 (58% through)[1]. Apps front-load the lower-friction email identifier and defer the higher-commitment phone ask.

Breakdown

IdentifierSignup flows collecting itShareAvg step askedPosition in flow
Email11375.8%3.5~54% through
Phone / OTP6543.6%4.3~58% through

Positions are normalized within each flow, so 'later' means later relative to that flow's own length, not a fixed screen number[1].

How to apply it

If your product genuinely needs a phone number (verification, SMS, delivery, contacts), collect email first and stage the phone ask after the user has some commitment — this matches what most tracked apps do. If phone is your primary identifier, you are in the minority (44%); make the value exchange explicit at the point you ask, because you are requesting it before the majority pattern would.

Caveats

Email prevalence at the auth-screen level is a loose text match and an upper bound[2]; the flow-level count here (113/149) is stricter but still extraction-based. Absence of a match is not proof the app never collects that identifier later. Phone-first is heavily concentrated in a few verticals (see the social and food cuts).

The numbers

StatComputed from
113/149 flows (75.8%) collect email; 65/149 (43.6%) collect phone/OTP; email avg step 3.5 (~54% through); phone avg step 4.3 (~58% through)phone_vs_email_ask_timing stat (row-numbered signup flow steps)
auth-screen email match is a loose upper boundsmallSampleWarnings: email prevalence uses loose 'email' match
Methodology. Universe: 149 signup flows from the Lazyweb mobile-app corpus; identifier collection and normalized ask-position derived from row-numbered flow steps joined to vision-extracted screen text, July 2026. Caveat: extraction-based, not ground truth.

Sources & citations

  1. [1] Lazyweb Research analysis of 149 signup flows (~146 companies), July 2026. Email vs phone collection and normalized ask-position computed per signup flow via row-numbered steps joined to screenshot text.
  2. [2] Lazyweb Research analysis of 289 companies with vision-covered auth screens, July 2026. Email prevalence at auth-screen level is a loose regex match, treated as an upper bound.

Source: Lazyweb Research — proprietary analysis of real, in-market app screens. Cite as Lazyweb Research, 2026-07-07.

Related questions

Explore the underlying screens, flows, and A/B tests inside Lazyweb. More research