What share of apps go self-serve (PLG) versus sales-led?
Product-led self-serve wins on volume: 179 of 599 companies with a tagged growth engine run PLG (29.9%), versus 59 running a sales-led B2B motion (9.8%) [1]. Counting product-led sales too, any product-led motion covers 213 companies (35.6%) against 59 with any sales motion (9.8%) [1]. Self-serve outnumbers sales-led roughly 3-to-1 in this corpus, but note the denominator is the 599 hand-tagged companies, not all 62k.
179 of 599 growth-engine-tagged companies (29.9%) are product-led self-serve versus 59 (9.8%) sales-led — July 2026.
| Item | Share of 599 |
|---|---|
| Product-led self-serve (PLG) | 29.9% |
| Any product-led (PLG or PLS) | 35.6% |
| Sales-led (B2B) | 9.8% |
| Any sales motion (Sales-led or PLS) | 9.8% |
| Product-led sales (PLS) | 5.7% |
The finding: self-serve is the modal motion
Among the 599 companies Lazyweb tags with at least one growth engine, product-led self-serve (PLG) is the single most common go-to-market motion outside pure marketing channels, and it outnumbers the sales-led B2B motion about 3-to-1 [1]. This is a consumer-heavy corpus, so the tilt toward self-serve is expected — but the gap is large enough to be the base-rate every founder should anchor on before assuming they need a sales team.
The breakdown
Deduplicated motion headcounts across the 599 tagged companies [1]:
| Motion | Companies | Share of 599 |
|---|---|---|
| Product-led self-serve (PLG) | 179 | 29.9% |
| Any product-led (PLG or PLS) | 213 | 35.6% |
| Sales-led (B2B) | 59 | 9.8% |
| Any sales motion (Sales-led or PLS) | 59 | 9.8% |
| Product-led sales (PLS) | 34 | 5.7% |
Every PLS company also carries the Sales-led tag, which is why 'any sales motion' equals sales-led at 59 [1].
How to apply it
If you are a consumer, prosumer, or bottoms-up SaaS founder, self-serve is the statistical default — 3 in 10 tagged companies grow that way and only 1 in 10 run a classic sales motion [1]. Treat 'we need enterprise AEs' as a claim to justify against your archetype, not an assumption. The sales-led share climbs sharply only for enterprise and collaborative products; see the archetype cut.
Caveats
The honest denominator is the 599 companies carrying a growth_engine tag, never the full 62,376-company table [1]. growth_engine is a multi-select array, so a company can carry several engines; the counts above are deduplicated headcounts of the specific motions. This corpus skews consumer, so the self-serve tilt is partly a composition effect — read the by-archetype page before generalizing to B2B.
The numbers
| Stat | Computed from |
|---|---|
| 179 of 599 (29.9%) | selfServeVsSalesOverall: PLG 179 / 599 |
| 213 of 599 (35.6%) | selfServeVsSalesOverall: Any product-led 213 / 599 |
| 59 of 599 (9.8%) | selfServeVsSalesOverall: Sales-led 59 / 599 |
| 34 of 599 (5.7%) | selfServeVsSalesOverall: PLS 34 / 599 |
| ~3-to-1 PLG:sales-led | 179 PLG / 59 sales-led = 3.03 |
Sources & citations
- [1] Lazyweb Research analysis of 599 companies, July 2026. selfServeVsSalesOverall: deduplicated PLG/PLS/sales-led headcounts; denominator = 599 companies with a growth_engine tag. ↩
Source: Lazyweb Research — proprietary analysis of real, in-market app screens. Cite as Lazyweb Research, 2026-07-09.