What do companies test on mobile vs web, and where does each platform concentrate experiments?

The experiment corpus is mobile-dominated ~12:1 — 4,449 detected mobile experiments vs 365 web (of 4,814 total) [1]. Where they test differs sharply: web concentrates on navigation, announcement bars, pricing tables and forms, while mobile concentrates on offers and pricing on the paywall [2]. Hero and CTA are heavily tested on both. Use the platform-specific hot spots to prioritize your own test roadmap.

4,449 mobile experiments vs 365 web (of 4,814 detected) — a ~12:1 split — Lazyweb Research, July 2026.

Lazyweb Research · n=4814 · Published 2026-07-07

experimentsmobilewebpricinglanding-page

Finding: same volume gap, different focus areas

Mobile carries ~12x the detected experiments of web [1]. The area mix (annotated observations) shows each platform's obsessions:

AreaWebMobile
HERO272216
NAV144
CTA91141
ANNOUNCEMENT BAR63
PRICING TABLE / PRICING47254
OFFER46255
FORM37
SOCIAL PROOF3414

Web-only areas (nav, announcement bar, form) reflect a page-diff surface; mobile-heavy areas (offer 255, pricing 254) reflect paywall economics [2].

How to apply this

If you run a mobile app, the corpus says the highest-leverage tests cluster on the paywall offer and price (255 offer + 254 pricing annotations) — test intro pricing, trial framing, and price points before chrome [2]. If you run a web product, tests cluster on hero messaging, navigation, and pricing-table structure, plus announcement bars and forms that have no mobile-paywall analog. Match your roadmap to where the platform's leverage actually sits rather than copying the other side.

Caveats

Web experiments (n=365) are ~12x fewer than mobile, so every web-side number here is an absolute count with explicit n, never a rate implying parity [1]. All 365 web experiments share one placeholder canonical screen id, so they are page diffs and not joinable to a screen graph — do not compute web experiment positions [3]. 'Detected experiment' means an observed before/after change, not a measured A/B lift.

The numbers

StatComputed from
4,449 mobile vs 365 web detected experiments (of 4,814)experiment_platform_split
Area mix: web HERO 272/NAV 144/CTA 91/PRICING TABLE 47/OFFER 46; mobile OFFER 255/PRICING 254/HERO 216/CTA 141experiment_area_mix_by_platform
365 web experiments all share placeholder canonical screen id 23588; mobile span 1,357 distinct screensweb_experiments_not_screen_anchored
Methodology. Universe: 4,814 detected experiments and 2,160 area annotations across mobile and web corpora, July 2026. Method: count experiments and area annotations by platform. Caveat: detected before/after changes with model-assigned areas, not measured A/B lift; web n is thin.

Sources & citations

  1. [1] Lazyweb Research analysis of 4,814 detected experiments (mobile + web corpora), July 2026. 4,449 mobile, 365 web.
  2. [2] Lazyweb Research analysis of 2,160 experiment area annotations (mobile + web corpora), July 2026. Area mix by platform from experiment annotations.
  3. [3] Lazyweb Research analysis of 365 web detected experiments (web corpus), July 2026. All web experiments point to one placeholder canonical screen; captured as page diffs.

Source: Lazyweb Research — proprietary analysis of real, in-market app screens. Cite as Lazyweb Research, 2026-07-07.

Related questions

Explore the underlying screens, flows, and A/B tests inside Lazyweb. More research