Do content products structure home feed-first or search-first?

Content and consumer verticals are feed-first, not search-first. In News (224 screens/7 companies), feed dominates with 71 screens; in Music (113/6), feed leads with 50.[1] Search-led home is the exception — Travel is the clearest browse/search-first vertical (browse_search 42, ahead of landing 35).[1] Default to a feed for consumer content unless discovery is the core job.

In News, feed is the dominant home surface — 71 of 224 labeled screens — vs a search-first pattern only in Travel — Lazyweb Research, July 2026.

Lazyweb Research · n=11753 · Published 2026-07-07

ux-patternswebdesignretention

The finding: feed dominates content verticals

The screen-type mix by content vertical shows feed as the lead surface in most.[1]

VerticalScreens / cosLead surface(s)
News224 / 7feed 71
Photo & Video248 / 8editor 91, feed 67
Music113 / 6feed 50
Social Networking187 / 6inbox 88
Entertainment117 / 5feed 29, browse_search 25
Travel181 / 7browse_search 42, landing 35

Feed leads News, Music, and Entertainment. Photo & Video is editor-first (creation tool). Social Networking is inbox-first (messaging). Travel is the one clearly search-first vertical.

How to apply it

Match the home surface to the core job: consumption verticals (news, music, entertainment) open a feed; creation tools (photo/video) open an editor; communication products (social) open an inbox; and discovery-driven products (travel) open browse/search.[1] If you're building a content product and debating feed vs search as the landing surface, the census says feed is the safe default — search-first is reserved for products where the user arrives with intent to find a specific thing (a trip, a listing).

Caveats

These verticals are small (5-8 companies each), so counts are absolute, not percentages — one large company can shift a vertical's mix.[1][2] The vertical join covers 562 of 671 companies; 109 don't join to a category.[2] Companies.category is noisy and required lower() normalization to merge casing duplicates. Single June 2026 capture wave.

The numbers

StatComputed from
News feed 71 (of 224/7 cos); Photo & Video editor 91 + feed 67 (248/8); Music feed 50 (113/6); Social Networking inbox 88 (187/6); Entertainment feed 29 + browse_search 25 (117/5); Travel browse_search 42 + landing 35 (181/7)vertical_screen_mix_content
562 of 671 web companies join to a categoryuniverse note: 562 of 671 join to companies.category
Methodology. Universe: 11,753 labeled desktop product screens across 671 web companies (sites_screen_labels), 562 joined to a vertical, captured June 2026. Method: screen-type counts per content vertical, retaining cells with COUNT>=8; published as absolute counts. Caveat: 5-8 companies per vertical; single capture wave.

Sources & citations

  1. [1] Lazyweb Research analysis of 11,753 labeled desktop product screens (671 web companies), July 2026. Screen-type mix by content vertical, cells with COUNT>=8; absolute counts (small n).
  2. [2] Lazyweb Research analysis of 11,753 labeled desktop product screens (671 web companies), July 2026. Category join coverage: 562 of 671 companies; category field noisy, lower()-normalized.

Source: Lazyweb Research — proprietary analysis of real, in-market app screens. Cite as Lazyweb Research, 2026-07-07.

Related questions

Explore the underlying screens, flows, and A/B tests inside Lazyweb. More research