Should a Signup Screen Offer Both Apple and Google, or Just One?

Across 289 companies tracked by Lazyweb Research, 38% offer both Apple and Google sign-in, while 46% show no big-three social login at all[1]. Only 10% are Google-only and 5% Apple-only — offering exactly one of the two is the rarest configuration[1]. The real decision is less Apple-vs-Google and more whether to include social login at all.

38% of companies offer both Apple and Google sign-in while 46% show no big-three social login at all — across 289 companies tracked by Lazyweb Research, July 2026.

Lazyweb Research · n=289 · Published 2026-07-07

signupux-patternsdesignsaasmobile

The finding

Among 289 companies with vision-covered auth screens: 38.1% (110) offer both Apple and Google, 10.4% (30) are Google-only, 4.8% (14) are Apple-only, and 46.4% (134) show none of the big-three social providers (Apple, Google, Facebook)[1]. Of that 134, 72 are email-first with no social login at all[1]. Picking exactly one of Apple/Google is the least common pattern in the corpus.

Breakdown

ConfigurationCompaniesShare
Both Apple + Google11038.1%
Google-only3010.4%
Apple-only144.8%
No big-3 social13446.4%
— of which email-first, no social7224.9%

Provider prevalence overall: Google appears on 48.8% of companies' auth screens, Apple on 43.6%[2].

How to apply it

If you commit to social login, offer Apple and Google together — that is what 38% do, and one-sided setups are rare (Apple-only 5%, Google-only 10%). But nearly half of tracked companies skip big-three social entirely, and a quarter are pure email-first, so 'no social login' is a fully mainstream choice, especially in regulated or identity-sensitive verticals.

Caveats

Provider presence is vision-text extraction, not ground truth — an absent match is not proof the app lacks the provider[2]. Facebook appears on only 22.1% of companies, so the big-three is effectively an Apple/Google story with Facebook as a fading third[2].

The numbers

StatComputed from
both Apple+Google 110/289 (38.1%); Google-only 30 (10.4%); Apple-only 14 (4.8%); no big-3 social 134 (46.4%); email-first no social 72 (24.9%)apple_google_pairing stat
Google 141/289 (48.8%); Apple 126/289 (43.6%); Facebook 64/289 (22.1%)sign_in_with_google_prevalence, sign_in_with_apple_prevalence, facebook_auth_prevalence stats
Methodology. Universe: 289 companies with vision-extracted auth screens in the Lazyweb corpus; provider combinations from per-company boolean flags, July 2026. Caveat: extraction-based; absence is not proof of absence.

Sources & citations

  1. [1] Lazyweb Research analysis of 289 companies with vision-covered auth screens, July 2026. Company-level provider combinations computed via boolean OR per provider across each company's auth screens.
  2. [2] Lazyweb Research analysis of 289 companies with vision-covered auth screens, July 2026. Provider prevalence from vision-text regex on captured auth screens; de-duplicated by company.

Source: Lazyweb Research — proprietary analysis of real, in-market app screens. Cite as Lazyweb Research, 2026-07-07.

Related questions

Explore the underlying screens, flows, and A/B tests inside Lazyweb. More research