# HealthKey Landing Page Growth Score | YC W25

Lazyweb publishes a public search API over its indexed pages; the guide is at https://www.lazyweb.com/agent-access.

Source: https://www.lazyweb.com/yc-w25/healthkey
Source observed: 2026-10-17T09:22:56.691Z
Last checked: 2026-10-20T07:36:55.973+00:00
Indexed: 2026-10-17T12:53:00.452+00:00

---

# HealthKey Landing Page Growth Score

We assess the landing page at [https://gethealthkey.com/](https://gethealthkey.com/) through our Growth Score report for YC W25. HealthKey’s overall **Growth Score is 68**, updated **September 21, 2026**. Its weakest category is **Trust**.

## Overall ranking and category scores

HealthKey ranks first among the four listed companies:

1. **HealthKey — 68**
2. [TriNetX — 62](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/trinetx.com)
3. [Paradigm — 54](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/paradigm.inc)
4. [Inato — 50](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/inato.com)

| Category | Score |
| --- | ---: |
| [Trust](https://www.lazyweb.com/yc-w25/healthkey#gs-trust) | 56 |
| [CTA](https://www.lazyweb.com/yc-w25/healthkey#gs-cta) | 58 |
| [Information hierarchy](https://www.lazyweb.com/yc-w25/healthkey#gs-information_hierarchy) | 72 |
| [Value props](https://www.lazyweb.com/yc-w25/healthkey#gs-value_props) | 74 |
| [Mobile web](https://www.lazyweb.com/yc-w25/healthkey#gs-mobile_web) | 78 |

[Fix Trust](https://www.lazyweb.com/plans/checkout?plan=individual&source=growth_score_feature_build_fixes)

## Score over time

The report includes a score-history chart comparing HealthKey, TriNetX, Inato, and Paradigm. The highlighted series is HealthKey.

## Trust — 56, Fair

Trust measures proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

| Company | Trust read |
| --- | --- |
| HealthKey | Product screenshot of the screening UI citing “NCT05683691” with dated radiology/pathology evidence per inclusion criteria. |
| TriNetX | “The world’s most-cited data source in peer-reviewed journals.” |
| Inato | “AI Innovation Awards Winner” badge shown in a mobile capture, bottom-right. |
| Paradigm | No visible trust signal identified. |

Trust ranking:

1. HealthKey — 56
2. TriNetX — 48
3. Paradigm — 42
4. Inato — 34

[Build proof section](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=gethealthkey.com#opt-trust-signals) to choose proof signals and receive copy and placement for a stronger trust section.

## CTA — 58, Fair

This category evaluates CTA copy, size, verb, and cost-feel. The HealthKey capture shows **“FIND OUT HOW”**; the comparison capture shows TriNetX’s **“Request a TriNetX LIVEN™ Demo.”**

Identified HealthKey CTA problems:

- It only scrolls and does not provide a conversion action.
- “Find out” promises reading rather than value.
- It conflicts with the navigation’s **Schedule Demo** action.
- The demo CTA is styled as a weak navigation link.

CTA ranking:

1. TriNetX — 68
2. HealthKey — 58
3. Inato — 58
4. Paradigm — 48

[Rewrite this CTA](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=gethealthkey.com#opt-cta-writing) to generate primary and secondary CTA options grounded in HealthKey’s offer and visitor objections.

## Information hierarchy — 72, Fair

This category evaluates whether the design helps or inhibits the page’s intended message.

![Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/gethealthkey.com.jpg?v=2026-09-21T01%3A12%3A51.379%2B00%3A00)

1. **FIND OUT HOW button:** The hero CTA is a scroll anchor rather than the conversion action; “Schedule Demo” should own this position.
2. **Schedule Demo navigation link:** The highest-intent action is a small blue text link crowded beside a same-size Login button.
3. **Lab results panel:** The right-edge document contains illegible micro-text that adds visual noise without communicating useful information.

[View layout plan](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=gethealthkey.com#opt-information-hierarchy) to turn these callouts into a sequenced keep, move, merge, or remove plan.

## Value props — 74, Fair

HealthKey’s landing-page headline is **“AI-Powered Patient Identification for Clinical Trial Teams”** with the subhead **“Integrate with your EHR and get emailed eligible patients for your clinical trials every day.”**

What is working:

- The headline names the exact buyer: clinical trial teams.
- The subhead states the mechanism: EHR input and daily email output.
- The hero screenshot shows a real screening workflow.

What could improve:

- There are zero numbers in the fold.
- The badges use generic verb–noun abstractions.
- The page has no emotional hook for chart-review pain.

Value-prop ranking:

1. HealthKey — 74
2. TriNetX — 58
3. Paradigm — 52
4. Inato — 48

## Mobile web — 78, Fair

This category evaluates the phone experience as a first-class experience.

![Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/gethealthkey.com-mobile.jpg?v=2026-09-21T01%3A12%3A51.379%2B00%3A00)

1. **FIND OUT HOW CTA:** The only tappable action is an anchor scroll rather than a conversion CTA; “Schedule Demo” is buried in the hamburger menu.
2. **Product screenshot text:** The desktop-density criteria UI shrinks to unreadable micro-text on the phone, adding noise without communicating anything.

[View mobile fixes](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=gethealthkey.com#opt-mobile-web) to convert these findings into a prioritized implementation checklist.

## Competitors

The listed competitors are inferred from product, audience, and value proposition:

- **HealthKey — 68**
- [**TriNetX — trinetx.com — 62**](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/trinetx.com)
- [**Paradigm — paradigm.inc — 54**](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/paradigm.inc)
- [**Inato — inato.com — 50**](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/inato.com)

---

[Read this page’s summary](https://www.lazyweb.com/api/public/v1/page-tldr?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lazyweb.com%2Fyc-w25%2Fhealthkey&trace=t_bc7e1c4e5b07)

## Ask a follow-up about this page

Need a more specific answer? Ask the exact question you have. It returns a fresh, cited answer from Lazyweb’s knowledge base. No account or API key required.

Open this URL with your own question, URL-encoded. Only q is required. No account or setup.

`GET https://www.lazyweb.com/agent/faq?q={question}&trace=t_bc7e1c4e5b07`

[Tool guide and examples](https://www.lazyweb.com/agent-access) · [OpenAPI](https://www.lazyweb.com/api/public/v1/openapi.json) · [Page TLDR form](https://www.lazyweb.com/agent-tools/page-tldr?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lazyweb.com%2Fyc-w25%2Fhealthkey). Opening a form does not execute a tool.