# Waddle Labs landing-page Growth Score report

Lazyweb publishes a public search API over its indexed pages; the guide is at https://www.lazyweb.com/agent-access.

Source: https://www.lazyweb.com/yc-s26/waddle-labs
Source observed: 2026-10-17T10:59:25.617Z
Last checked: 2026-10-17T10:59:25.617+00:00
Indexed: 2026-10-17T14:34:38.38+00:00

---

# Waddle Labs landing-page Growth Score report

[← Back to YC S26](https://www.lazyweb.com/yc-s26)

We are Waddle Labs, and our website is [https://www.waddlelabs.ai/](https://www.waddlelabs.ai/). This Lazyweb report evaluates our landing page across trust, call-to-action design, value propositions, mobile web, and information hierarchy. Our landing page describes **“LLM agents for robotics control”** and uses the subtitle **“The last frontier in machine intelligence may fall to the bitter lesson.”**

## Overall result

Our overall Growth Score is **59 of 100**, updated **September 20, 2026**. Our weakest category is **Trust**, scored **38**.

| Category | Score |
|---|---:|
| Trust | 38 |
| CTA | 58 |
| Value props | 58 |
| Mobile web | 68 |
| Information hierarchy | 72 |

[Fix Trust](https://www.lazyweb.com/plans/checkout?plan=individual&source=growth_score_feature_build_fixes)

## Ranking in YC S26

1. [Sereact — 69](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/sereact.ai)
2. Waddle Labs — **59**
3. [Physical Intelligence — 56](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/physicalintelligence.company)
4. [Skild AI — 50](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/skild.ai)

## Score over time

- **September 20, 2026:** Overall 59; Value props 58; Trust 38. The report records changes of Overall −2, Value props −20, and Trust −10.
- [September 14, 2026 — first tracked report](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/history/2026-09-14): overall score 61, strongest Value props 78, and weakest Trust 48.

## Trust — 38, Poor

Trust measures proof that a product is real, competent, and safe to try.

![Sereact trust example](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/sereact.ai.jpg?v=2026-07-31T07%3A58%3A21.077%2B00%3A00)

![Physical Intelligence trust example](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/physicalintelligence.company.jpg?v=2026-07-24T13%3A21%3A34.316%2B00%3A00)

| Company | Trust read |
|---|---|
| Waddle Labs | No visible trust signal identified. |
| Physical Intelligence | Dated research timeline, for example “π0.7: a Steerable Model with Emergent Capabilities — April 16, 2026”. |
| Skild AI | No visible trust signal identified. |
| Sereact | “$110M Series B - led by Headline” news badge. |

### Trust ranking

1. Sereact — 63
2. Physical Intelligence — 52
3. Waddle Labs — **38**
4. Skild AI — 34

[Build proof section](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=waddlelabs.ai#opt-trust-signals) — the proof-section builder selects proof signals and provides copy and placement for a stronger trust section.

## CTA — 58, Fair

This category evaluates CTA copy, size, verb, and cost-feel: whether the primary CTA earns the click.

![Waddle Labs CTA comparison](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/waddlelabs.ai.jpg?v=2026-09-20T06%3A12%3A15.194%2B00%3A00)

![Sereact CTA comparison](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/sereact.ai.jpg?v=2026-07-31T07%3A58%3A21.077%2B00%3A00)

The report identifies these CTA problems:

- The CTA is styled as a tiny text link rather than a button.
- Its footprint is dwarfed by the headline.
- The word “our” uses company voice rather than visitor-oriented language.
- The copy implies no payoff.

### CTA ranking

1. Sereact — 63
2. Waddle Labs — **58**
3. Physical Intelligence — 44
4. Skild AI — 42

[Rewrite this CTA](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=waddlelabs.ai#opt-cta-writing) to generate primary and secondary CTA options grounded in our offer and visitor objections.

## Value propositions — 58, Fair

This category evaluates whether the title, subtitle, and hero sell the product’s true value.

### Our landing-page headline

> **“LLM agents for robotics control”**
>
> “The last frontier in machine intelligence may fall to the bitter lesson.”

### What works

- Names the domain and audience instantly.
- Uses a confident, research-lab tone.
- Avoids a buzzword abstraction stack.

### What could improve

- The subhead is insider jargon with zero specifics.
- The fold has no outcome, proof, or numbers.
- There is no hero visual showing robots in action.

### Value-proposition ranking

1. Sereact — 68
2. Physical Intelligence — 64
3. Waddle Labs — **58**
4. Skild AI — 58

## Mobile web — 68, Fair

This category evaluates the phone experience as a first-class citizen.

![Mobile web annotations on the Waddle Labs capture](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/waddlelabs.ai-mobile.jpg?v=2026-09-20T06%3A12%3A15.194%2B00%3A00)

1. **Read our research link:** The only CTA is a small text link, not a thumb-friendly full-width button.
2. **Desktop navigation link row:** The full “Developers / Research” link row remains uncollapsed instead of becoming a hamburger menu.

[View mobile fixes](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=waddlelabs.ai#opt-mobile-web) for a prioritized implementation checklist.

## Information hierarchy — 72, Fair

This category evaluates whether the design helps or inhibits what the page is trying to say.

![Information hierarchy annotations on the Waddle Labs desktop capture](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/waddlelabs.ai.jpg?v=2026-09-20T06%3A12%3A15.194%2B00%3A00)

1. **Read our research link:** The only conversion action is a small underlined text link, easily missed against the giant headline.
2. **Developers / Research navigation:** Navigation links have the same visual weight as the CTA, giving exits equal claim on the click.
3. **Headline lacks a visual anchor:** No imagery or motif communicates robotics or agents; the fold could belong to any AI lab.

[View layout plan](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=waddlelabs.ai#opt-information-hierarchy) for a sequenced plan to keep, move, merge, or remove elements.

## Competitors

The competitor set is inferred from product, audience, and value proposition.

1. [Sereact — sereact.ai — 69](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/sereact.ai)
2. Waddle Labs — 59
3. [Physical Intelligence — physicalintelligence.company — 56](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/physicalintelligence.company)
4. [Skild AI — skild.ai — 50](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/skild.ai)
5. [Covariant — covariant.ai — failed](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/covariant.ai)

---

[Read this page’s summary](https://www.lazyweb.com/api/public/v1/page-tldr?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lazyweb.com%2Fyc-s26%2Fwaddle-labs&trace=t_bc7e1c4e5b07)

## Ask a follow-up about this page

Need a more specific answer? Ask the exact question you have. It returns a fresh, cited answer from Lazyweb’s knowledge base. No account or API key required.

Open this URL with your own question, URL-encoded. Only q is required. No account or setup.

`GET https://www.lazyweb.com/agent/faq?q={question}&trace=t_bc7e1c4e5b07`

[Tool guide and examples](https://www.lazyweb.com/agent-access) · [OpenAPI](https://www.lazyweb.com/api/public/v1/openapi.json) · [Page TLDR form](https://www.lazyweb.com/agent-tools/page-tldr?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lazyweb.com%2Fyc-s26%2Fwaddle-labs). Opening a form does not execute a tool.