# Robocurve YC S26 landing-page Growth Score report

Lazyweb publishes a public search API over its indexed pages; the guide is at https://www.lazyweb.com/agent-access.

Source: https://www.lazyweb.com/yc-s26/robocurve
Source observed: 2026-10-01T14:44:01.827Z
Last checked: 2026-10-20T07:57:24.712+00:00
Indexed: 2026-10-01T16:57:45.689+00:00

---

# Robocurve YC S26 landing-page Growth Score report

We are **Robocurve**, whose landing page is [https://robocurve.org/](https://robocurve.org/). Our product is described as providing **real-world evaluations of physical AI**: we measure and report frontier robotics capabilities to the public.

[← Back to YC S26](https://www.lazyweb.com/yc-s26)

## Overall result

Our Growth Score is **74/100**, updated **Sep 20, 2026**. Our weakest category is **CTA**, scored **64**.

[Fix CTA](https://www.lazyweb.com/plans/checkout?plan=individual&source=growth_score_feature_build_fixes)

| Category | Score |
| --- | ---: |
| CTA | 64 |
| Trust | 72 |
| Value props | 76 |
| Information hierarchy | 78 |
| Mobile web | 82 |

## Score over time

- **Sep 20, 2026 — 74**, live report: overall −1, value props +4, mobile web −4.
- [**Sep 6, 2026 — 75**](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/history/2026-09-06): overall +10, mobile web +28, CTA +12.
- [**Aug 1, 2026 — 65**](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/history/2026-08-01): first tracked report; strongest category was Value props at 78 and weakest was CTA at 52.

## CTA — 64, Fair

This category assesses whether the primary CTA’s copy, size, verb, and perceived cost earn the click.

![Robocurve CTA comparison capture](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/robocurve.org.jpg?v=2026-09-20T05%3A50%3A19.36%2B00%3A00)

Our primary CTA is **“Talk to us →”**. The comparison also shows **“Get Started”** for Physical Intelligence Benchmarks (Scale AI) and **“See all AI trends & statistics”** for Epoch AI.

### Problems identified

- The click feels costly because it asks for a call.
- We do not promise value for the click.
- **“Talk”** is a weak action verb.

### CTA ranking

1. Physical Intelligence Benchmarks (Scale AI) — 68
2. Epoch AI — 68
3. Robocurve — 64
4. METR — 64
5. Artificial Analysis — 48

CTA rewrite options can be generated in the [CTA rewrite studio](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=robocurve.org#opt-cta-writing), which is described as generating primary and secondary CTA options grounded in our offer and visitor objections.

## Trust — 72, Fair

This category assesses proof that a product is real, competent, and safe to try.

![Robocurve trust comparison capture](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/robocurve.org.jpg?v=2026-09-20T05%3A50%3A19.36%2B00%3A00)

Our trust signal is a **“Backed by Y Combinator”** badge above the hero headline.

| Company | Trust read |
| --- | --- |
| Robocurve | “Backed by Y Combinator” badge above the hero headline |
| Physical Intelligence Benchmarks (Scale AI) | Implicit context may benefit from pre-existing familiarity among its target audience. |
| Epoch AI | “Trusted by leading publications and institutions” logo strip, including Our World in Data, DSIT, and the Government of the Netherlands; the supplied text is truncated after “N”. |
| METR | “Non-public information and model access provided by:” with Anthropic, Google DeepMind, Meta, and OpenAI logos on the supplied capture. |
| Artificial Analysis | Live benchmark charts titled “Intelligence,” “Speed,” and “Cost per Task,” comparing named models with specific scores. |

### Trust ranking

1. Epoch AI — 82
2. METR — 76
3. Robocurve — 72
4. Artificial Analysis — 72
5. Physical Intelligence Benchmarks (Scale AI) — 52

The [proof section builder](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=robocurve.org#opt-trust-signals) is described as helping choose proof signals and providing copy and placement for a stronger trust section.

## Value props — 76, Fair

This category assesses whether the title, subtitle, and hero communicate the product’s true value.

### Our headline and subhead

> **“Real-world evaluations of physical AI”**
>
> “We measure and report frontier robotics capabilities to the public.”

### What is working

- Honest, concrete category claim.
- Benchmark cards prove the work live.
- Robot-arm hero shows the product doing its job.

### What could improve

- No numbers are provided for tests run or models covered.
- The subhead restates the headline.
- There are no emotional stakes for the audience.

### Value-proposition ranking

1. Robocurve — 76
2. Epoch AI — 76
3. Artificial Analysis — 76
4. METR — 72
5. Physical Intelligence Benchmarks (Scale AI) — 52

## Information hierarchy — 78, Fair

This category assesses whether the design helps or inhibits the page’s message.

![Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/robocurve.org.jpg?v=2026-09-20T05%3A50%3A19.36%2B00%3A00)

The annotated desktop capture identifies four issues:

1. **Three benchmark cards:** Three dense chart cards enter the fold at equal weight, forcing visitors to arbitrate before the hero message lands.
2. **LLM speed chart:** Tiny multi-series labels—“Mercury 2,” “Gemini,” and “Claude Fable 5”—are illegible at fold size and add noise.
3. **Scatter-plot legend:** A four-item legend and in-chart callouts ask for analysis work that the fold should not demand.
4. **Duplicate “Talk to us”:** The navigation button repeats the hero CTA at identical weight, splitting attention between two targets for one action.

The [layout priority plan](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=robocurve.org#opt-information-hierarchy) is described as turning these callouts into a sequenced plan to keep, move, merge, or remove elements.

## Mobile web — 82, Strong

This category evaluates the phone experience as a first-class experience.

![Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/robocurve.org-mobile.jpg?v=2026-09-20T05%3A50%3A19.36%2B00%3A00)

The mobile annotations identify two issues:

1. **Header “Talk to us”:** It duplicates the hero CTA inside the collapsed navigation, crowding the hamburger and splitting attention.
2. **“Why it matters” button:** A ghost button sits at equal weight beside the primary CTA, diluting the single-tap decision.

## Competitors

These competitors are inferred from product, audience, and value proposition. The overall ranking is:

1. [Epoch AI — epoch.ai — 76](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/epoch.ai)
2. Robocurve — 74
3. [METR — metr.org — 73](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/metr.org)
4. [Artificial Analysis — artificialanalysis.ai — 65](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/artificialanalysis.ai)
5. [Physical Intelligence Benchmarks (Scale AI) — scale.com — 61](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/scale.com)

These are separate organizations and products; their scores are comparison results, not Robocurve results.

---

[Read this page’s summary](https://www.lazyweb.com/api/public/v1/page-tldr?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lazyweb.com%2Fyc-s26%2Frobocurve&trace=t_bc7e1c4e5b07)

## Ask a follow-up about this page

Need a more specific answer? Ask the exact question you have. It returns a fresh, cited answer from Lazyweb’s knowledge base. No account or API key required.

Open this URL with your own question, URL-encoded. Only q is required. No account or setup.

`GET https://www.lazyweb.com/agent/faq?q={question}&trace=t_bc7e1c4e5b07`

[Tool guide and examples](https://www.lazyweb.com/agent-access) · [OpenAPI](https://www.lazyweb.com/api/public/v1/openapi.json) · [Page TLDR form](https://www.lazyweb.com/agent-tools/page-tldr?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lazyweb.com%2Fyc-s26%2Frobocurve). Opening a form does not execute a tool.