# Parasma Landing Page Growth Score | YC S26 | Lazyweb

Lazyweb publishes a public search API over its indexed pages; the guide is at https://www.lazyweb.com/agent-access.

Source: https://www.lazyweb.com/yc-s26/parasma
Source observed: 2026-10-20T07:01:34.060Z
Last checked: 2026-10-20T07:01:34.06+00:00
Indexed: 2026-10-20T08:52:16.835+00:00

---

# Parasma Landing Page Growth Score

[← Back to YC S26](https://www.lazyweb.com/yc-s26)  
[Parasma](https://parasma.com/)

We score Parasma’s landing page across five categories. Its overall **Growth Score is 54**, updated **September 20, 2026**, and its weakest category is **CTA**.

## Overall ranking and category scores

Parasma ranks **third** among the four listed sites:

1. [Cortical Labs — 65](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/corticallabs.com)
2. [Koniku — 62](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/koniku.com)
3. Parasma — **54**
4. [FinalSpark — 44](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/finalspark.com)

| Category | Score | Rating or action |
| --- | ---: | --- |
| CTA | 38 | Poor; [Fix CTA](https://www.lazyweb.com/plans/checkout?plan=individual&source=growth_score_feature_build_fixes) |
| Mobile web | 52 | Fair |
| Information hierarchy | 58 | Fair |
| Trust | 58 | Fair |
| Value props | 62 | Fair |

- [CTA — 38](https://www.lazyweb.com/yc-s26/parasma#gs-cta)
- [Mobile web — 52](https://www.lazyweb.com/yc-s26/parasma#gs-mobile_web)
- [Information hierarchy — 58](https://www.lazyweb.com/yc-s26/parasma#gs-information_hierarchy)
- [Trust — 58](https://www.lazyweb.com/yc-s26/parasma#gs-trust)
- [Value props — 62](https://www.lazyweb.com/yc-s26/parasma#gs-value_props)

## Score over time

- **September 20, 2026:** 54, live; no score movement.
- **September 13, 2026:** 54, first tracked report; strongest category was Value props at 62 and weakest was CTA at 38. [View the historical report](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/history/2026-09-13).

## CTA — 38, Poor

We assess whether the primary CTA’s copy, size, verb, and cost-feel earn the click.

![Cortical Labs landing-page comparison](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/corticallabs.com.jpg?v=2026-09-22T16%3A22%3A45.45%2B00%3A00)

![Koniku landing-page comparison](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/koniku.com.jpg?v=2026-09-21T00%3A34%3A12.979%2B00%3A00)

### Problems identified

- No CTA appears anywhere in the fold.
- Navigation links are the only actions.
- The press strip has no action attached.

### CTA comparison ranking

1. Cortical Labs — 58
2. Koniku — 58
3. Parasma — 38
4. FinalSpark — 38

[Rewrite this CTA](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=parasma.com#opt-cta-writing) with primary and secondary options grounded in Parasma’s offer and visitor objections.

## Mobile web — 52, Fair

We assess the phone experience as a first-class conversion surface.

![Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/parasma.com-mobile.jpg?v=2026-09-20T05%3A32%3A15.992%2B00%3A00)

1. **Hero headline block:** No primary CTA accompanies the headline, so the fold offers nothing to tap toward conversion.
2. **Desktop nav link row:** Three uncollapsed text links are used instead of a hamburger; they are the only tappable elements and none convert.
3. **Clipped press logo:** The leftmost “FEATURED IN” logo is cut to a sliver at the screen edge, breaking the credibility strip.

[View mobile fixes](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=parasma.com#opt-mobile-web) to turn these findings into a prioritized implementation checklist.

## Information hierarchy — 58, Fair

We assess whether the design helps or inhibits what the page is trying to say.

![Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/parasma.com.jpg?v=2026-09-20T05%3A32%3A15.992%2B00%3A00)

1. **Clipped CNN logo:** The first press logo is cut off at the left edge, making the credibility strip look broken.
2. **Top-right navigation links:** RESEARCH, NEWS, and ABOUT are the only clickable elements in the fold, so attention leaks into secondary pages.

[View layout plan](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=parasma.com#opt-information-hierarchy) to turn these callouts into a sequenced keep, move, merge, or remove plan.

## Trust — 58, Fair

We assess proof that a product is real, competent, and safe to try.

| Company | Trust read |
| --- | --- |
| Parasma | Its “FEATURED IN” press-logo strip lists NewScientist, VICE, LBC, The Economist, Smithsonian, The Guardian, The Times, and nature. |
| Cortical Labs | Cortical Labs may benefit from implicit familiarity among its target audience. |
| FinalSpark | No visible trust signal identified. |
| Koniku | No visible trust signal identified. |

### Trust comparison ranking

1. Parasma — 58
2. Koniku — 42
3. Cortical Labs — 38
4. FinalSpark — 38

[Build proof section](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=parasma.com#opt-trust-signals) to choose proof signals and get copy and placement for a stronger trust section.

## Value props — 62, Fair

We assess whether the title, subtitle, and hero sell the product’s true value.

### Parasma’s headline

> “We train brain cells for compute.”

#### Working

- Names the real product in six words.
- Uses provocative, memorable phrasing.
- Elite press logos back the claim.

#### Could improve

- No subhead explains the payoff.
- There are zero numbers or concrete outcomes.
- The fold is empty and shows none of the technology.

### Value-proposition comparison ranking

1. Cortical Labs — 76
2. Parasma — 62
3. Koniku — 58
4. FinalSpark — 48

## Competitors

Competitors are inferred from product, audience, and value proposition.

| Rank | Company | Domain | Growth score |
| ---: | --- | --- | ---: |
| 1 | [Cortical Labs](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/corticallabs.com) | corticallabs.com | 65 |
| 2 | [Koniku](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/koniku.com) | koniku.com | 62 |
| 3 | Parasma | — | 54 |
| 4 | [FinalSpark](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/finalspark.com) | finalspark.com | 44 |

---

[Read this page’s summary](https://www.lazyweb.com/api/public/v1/page-tldr?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lazyweb.com%2Fyc-s26%2Fparasma&trace=t_bc7e1c4e5b07)

## Ask a follow-up about this page

Need a more specific answer? Ask the exact question you have. It returns a fresh, cited answer from Lazyweb’s knowledge base. No account or API key required.

Open this URL with your own question, URL-encoded. Only q is required. No account or setup.

`GET https://www.lazyweb.com/agent/faq?q={question}&trace=t_bc7e1c4e5b07`

[Tool guide and examples](https://www.lazyweb.com/agent-access) · [OpenAPI](https://www.lazyweb.com/api/public/v1/openapi.json) · [Page TLDR form](https://www.lazyweb.com/agent-tools/page-tldr?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lazyweb.com%2Fyc-s26%2Fparasma). Opening a form does not execute a tool.