# Context.dev Landing Page Growth Score | YC S26 | Lazyweb

Lazyweb publishes a public search API over its indexed pages; the guide is at https://www.lazyweb.com/agent-access.

Source: https://www.lazyweb.com/yc-s26/contextdev
Source observed: 2026-10-17T10:03:52.992Z
Last checked: 2026-10-17T10:03:52.992+00:00
Indexed: 2026-10-17T14:01:09.995+00:00

---

# Context.dev Landing Page Growth Score

[← Back to YC S26](https://www.lazyweb.com/yc-s26)

[Context.dev](https://context.dev/)

We score Context.dev’s landing page across Trust, Information hierarchy, CTA, Value props, and Mobile web. Context.dev’s weakest category is **Trust**.

## Overall score and ranking

**Growth score: 73/100** · updated **September 20, 2026**

Context.dev ranks **#3** in the comparison shown on this report:

1. [Exa — 82](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/exa.ai)
2. [Firecrawl — 78](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/firecrawl.dev)
3. Context.dev — 73
4. [Tavily — 73](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/tavily.com)
5. [ScrapingBee — 72](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/scrapingbee.com)
6. [Jina AI (Reader) — 43](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/jina.ai)

[Fix Trust](https://www.lazyweb.com/plans/checkout?plan=individual&source=growth_score_feature_build_fixes)

## Category scores

- [Trust — 58](https://www.lazyweb.com/yc-s26/contextdev#gs-trust)
- [Information hierarchy — 72](https://www.lazyweb.com/yc-s26/contextdev#gs-information_hierarchy)
- [CTA — 78](https://www.lazyweb.com/yc-s26/contextdev#gs-cta)
- [Value props — 78](https://www.lazyweb.com/yc-s26/contextdev#gs-value_props)
- [Mobile web — 78](https://www.lazyweb.com/yc-s26/contextdev#gs-mobile_web)

## Score over time

1. **September 20, 2026 — 73:** Live overall +2; Trust +10; Information hierarchy −6.
2. [September 15, 2026 — 71](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/history/2026-09-15): First tracked report; strongest CTA 82; weakest Trust 48.

## Trust — 58, Fair

**Question:** What proof shows that the product is real, competent, and safe to try?

![Context.dev trust capture](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/context.dev.jpg?v=2026-09-20T04%3A31%3A12.313%2B00%3A00)

The report compares these trust signals:

| Company | Trust read |
|---|---|
| Context.dev | “Backed by Y Combinator” badge above the hero headline. |
| Firecrawl | GitHub star count “182.3K” in the desktop navigation. |
| Exa | Customer-logo wall showing AWS, Databricks, Groq, Gamma, and monday.com. |
| Tavily | Interactive query demo widget: “What are the latest updates with Nvidia?” with search, extract, crawl, and research tabs. |
| Jina AI (Reader) | Elastic logo co-branded with the Jina logo in the header. |
| ScrapingBee | Capterra 4.9 and G2 4.8 rating badges, “based on 100+ reviews,” under the signup CTAs. |

### Trust comparison

1. Exa — 78
2. Firecrawl — 68
3. ScrapingBee — 68
4. Context.dev — 58
5. Tavily — 46
6. Jina AI (Reader) — 38

[Build proof section](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=context.dev#opt-trust-signals) to choose proof signals and their copy and placement.

## Information hierarchy — 72, Fair

**Question:** Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

![Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/context.dev.jpg?v=2026-09-20T04%3A31%3A12.313%2B00%3A00)

1. **Interactive demo widget:** Nine same-weight mode tabs, including “Extract,” “Markdown,” and “Brand,” fragment one action into a toolbar visitors must parse.
2. **Top navigation row:** Seven navigation items plus “Book a Call” and “Sign Up” create approximately 10 exit paths that outrank the URL bar’s tiny arrow button.
3. **URL input submit arrow:** The primary action is a small dark circle at the field’s edge, the least visually prominent button in the fold.
4. **Announcement banner:** The “Introducing /answers” banner is a full-width clickable exit above the brand and headline.

[View layout plan](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=context.dev#opt-information-hierarchy) to turn the callouts into a sequenced keep/move/merge/remove plan.

## CTA — 78, Fair

**Question:** Do the copy, size, verb, and cost-feel earn the click?

![Context.dev CTA capture](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/context.dev.jpg?v=2026-09-20T04%3A31%3A12.313%2B00%3A00)

### Problems

- The submit control is an icon-only arrow with no label.
- The placeholder is an example URL rather than a verb.
- The free offer appears below the CTA rather than on it.
- On mobile, the placeholder truncates to “li”.

### CTA comparison

1. Firecrawl — 88
2. Exa — 84
3. Tavily — 82
4. Context.dev — 78
5. ScrapingBee — 64
6. Jina AI (Reader) — 48

[Rewrite this CTA](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=context.dev#opt-cta-writing) to generate primary and secondary CTA options grounded in Context.dev’s offer and visitor objections.

## Value props — 78, Fair

**Question:** Do the title, subtitle, and hero sell the product’s true value?

The report says Context.dev’s headline sells:

> “Web data {API} for AI agents”
>
> “Web scraping, data, and search infrastructure for AI products.”

### Working

- Names the category and buyer immediately.
- A live demo bar shows the product working.
- The YC badge and free credits add proof.

### Could improve

- No outcome or pain is named.
- No scale or performance numbers are provided.
- The feature framing is flat and affectless.

### Value-prop comparison

1. Firecrawl — 82
2. Exa — 82
3. ScrapingBee — 82
4. Context.dev — 78
5. Tavily — 78
6. Jina AI (Reader) — 32

## Mobile web — 78, Fair

**Question:** Is the phone experience treated as a first-class experience?

![Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/context.dev-mobile.jpg?v=2026-09-20T04%3A31%3A12.313%2B00%3A00)

1. **Truncated tab row:** Tabs collapse to “Markdown,” a lone “B,” and “+5,” hiding capabilities behind cryptic labels.
2. **Small arrow submit:** The primary action is an unlabeled circular arrow rather than a thumb-friendly labeled full-width button.
3. **Cut-off URL placeholder:** The placeholder truncates to “https://li,” providing no readable example of what to enter.

[View mobile fixes](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=context.dev#opt-mobile-web) for a prioritized implementation checklist.

## Competitors

The report infers these competitors from product, audience, and value proposition:

1. [Exa — 82](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/exa.ai)
2. [Firecrawl — 78](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/firecrawl.dev)
3. Context.dev — 73
4. [Tavily — 73](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/tavily.com)
5. [ScrapingBee — 72](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/scrapingbee.com)
6. [Jina AI (Reader) — 43](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/jina.ai)

Context.dev’s website is [https://context.dev/](https://context.dev/).

---

[Read this page’s summary](https://www.lazyweb.com/api/public/v1/page-tldr?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lazyweb.com%2Fyc-s26%2Fcontextdev&trace=t_bc7e1c4e5b07)

## Ask a follow-up about this page

Need a more specific answer? Ask the exact question you have. It returns a fresh, cited answer from Lazyweb’s knowledge base. No account or API key required.

Open this URL with your own question, URL-encoded. Only q is required. No account or setup.

`GET https://www.lazyweb.com/agent/faq?q={question}&trace=t_bc7e1c4e5b07`

[Tool guide and examples](https://www.lazyweb.com/agent-access) · [OpenAPI](https://www.lazyweb.com/api/public/v1/openapi.json) · [Page TLDR form](https://www.lazyweb.com/agent-tools/page-tldr?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lazyweb.com%2Fyc-s26%2Fcontextdev). Opening a form does not execute a tool.