# Perseus Defense Landing Page Growth Score | YC S25 | Lazyweb

Lazyweb publishes a public search API over its indexed pages; the guide is at https://www.lazyweb.com/agent-access.

Source: https://www.lazyweb.com/yc-s25/perseus-defense
Source observed: 2026-10-15T19:13:26.974Z
Last checked: 2026-10-17T10:27:54.321+00:00
Indexed: 2026-10-15T21:51:46.508+00:00

---

# Perseus Defense Landing Page Growth Score

We provide a Growth Score report for [Perseus Defense](https://perseusdefense.com/) as part of the YC S25 landing-page reports. The report evaluates the landing page across Trust, CTA, Information hierarchy, Value props, and Mobile web.

## Overall score

- **Growth score:** **72/100**, updated **Sep 23, 2026**
- **Weakest category:** Trust
- **Category scores:** Trust **58**, CTA **62**, Information hierarchy **78**, Value props **80**, Mobile web **83**
- [Fix Trust](https://www.lazyweb.com/plans/checkout?plan=individual&source=growth_score_feature_build_fixes)

## Ranking against competitors

1. Perseus Defense — **72**
2. [Fortem Technologies](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/fortemtech.com) — **65**
3. [Epirus](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/epirusinc.com) — **57**
4. [MARSS](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/marss.com) — **54**
5. [DroneShield](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/droneshield.com) — **52**
6. [Anduril Industries (Anvil)](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/anduril.com) — **43**

## Score over time

The report lists these overall reports and changes:

1. **Sep 23, 2026:** 72; overall **+2**, Mobile web **+7**, Information hierarchy **−6**; live report
2. [Sep 9, 2026](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/history/2026-09-09): 70; overall **+6**, Trust **+22**, Mobile web **+8**
3. [Jun 7, 2026](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/history/2026-06-07): 64; overall **−3**, CTA **−6**, Information hierarchy **−4**
4. [May 13, 2026](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/history/2026-05-13): 67; first tracked report; strongest Information hierarchy **86**, weakest Trust **38**

## Trust — 58, Fair

Trust concerns whether the product appears real, competent, and safe to try.

| Company | Trust read |
| --- | --- |
| Perseus Defense | No visible trust signal identified. |
| Anduril Industries (Anvil) | Implicit context may benefit from pre-existing familiarity among its target audience. |
| Epirus | Hero field footage of a military vehicle carrying mounted hardware on a desert road. |
| DroneShield | Implicit context may benefit from pre-existing familiarity among its target audience. |
| Fortem Technologies | No visible trust signal identified. |
| MARSS | No visible trust signal identified. |

### Trust ranking

1. Perseus Defense — **58**
2. Fortem Technologies — **52**
3. MARSS — **52**
4. Epirus — **45**
5. Anduril Industries (Anvil) — **44**
6. DroneShield — **42**

[Build proof section](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=perseusdefense.com#opt-trust-signals) to choose proof signals and get copy and placement for a stronger trust section.

## CTA — 62, Fair

The CTA review considers copy, size, verb, and cost-feel. The report compares Perseus Defense’s **JOIN NEWSLETTER** CTA with Epirus’s **PARTNER WITH US** CTA.

![Perseus Defense and Epirus CTA comparison](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/perseusdefense.com.jpg?v=2026-09-23T00%3A14%3A52.333%2B00%3A00)

Problems identified for the Perseus Defense CTA:

- A newsletter is a low-value ask.
- No payoff is named for the click.
- The CTA is small versus the desktop headline.

### CTA ranking

1. Epirus — **66**
2. Perseus Defense — **62**
3. DroneShield — **62**
4. Fortem Technologies — **61**
5. Anduril Industries (Anvil) — **44**
6. MARSS — **42**

[Rewrite this CTA](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=perseusdefense.com#opt-cta-writing) to generate primary and secondary CTA options grounded in Perseus Defense’s offer and visitor objections.

## Information hierarchy — 78, Fair

![Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/perseusdefense.com.jpg?v=2026-09-23T00%3A14%3A52.333%2B00%3A00)

The annotated desktop review identifies:

1. **JOIN NEWSLETTER button:** Muted orange at a small footprint underweights the sole conversion action against the dramatic photo.
2. **Email input field:** A transparent dark field with a thin border nearly disappears into the shadowed background.
3. **MISSION nav-link underline:** Orange uses the same accent color as the CTA, splitting attention with a navigation exit.

[View layout plan](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=perseusdefense.com#opt-information-hierarchy) to turn these callouts into a sequenced keep, move, merge, or remove plan.

## Value props — 80, Strong

The report evaluates the headline, subtitle, and hero. Perseus Defense’s headline is:

> **“LOW COST MISSILES BUILT FOR MODERN DRONE WARFARE.”**
>
> “Portable Kinetic Missile Interceptor System for Group 1 and Group 2 Threats.”

### Working

- Leads with cost, identified as the real buying criterion.
- The Group 1/2 threat specification speaks buyer language.
- The hero shows a live launch rather than stock decoration.

### Could improve

- “Low cost” has no number behind it.
- No proof points or test milestones appear above the fold.
- The newsletter CTA is weaker than a demo or contact ask.

### Value-prop ranking

1. Perseus Defense — **80**
2. Fortem Technologies — **70**
3. MARSS — **68**
4. DroneShield — **44**
5. Anduril Industries (Anvil) — **34**
6. Epirus — **34**

## Mobile web — 83, Strong

![Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/perseusdefense.com-mobile.jpg?v=2026-09-23T00%3A14%3A52.333%2B00%3A00)

The mobile review identifies:

1. **Join Newsletter button:** Semi-transparent orange fill blends into the dark case photo, muting the primary tap target.
2. **Email input field:** A thin light border on a busy dark image makes the field easy to miss as an input.
3. **Subhead over sky:** Grey-white body text sits on a mid-tone cloud area, reducing legibility at arm’s length.

## Competitors

The report infers competitors from product, audience, and value proposition:

1. Perseus Defense — **72**
2. [Fortem Technologies](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/fortemtech.com) — **65**
3. [Epirus](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/epirusinc.com) — **57**
4. [MARSS](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/marss.com) — **54**
5. [DroneShield](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/droneshield.com) — **52**
6. [Anduril Industries (Anvil)](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/anduril.com) — **43**

[← Back to YC S25](https://www.lazyweb.com/yc-s25)

---

[Read this page’s summary](https://www.lazyweb.com/api/public/v1/page-tldr?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lazyweb.com%2Fyc-s25%2Fperseus-defense&trace=t_bc7e1c4e5b07)

## Ask a follow-up about this page

Need a more specific answer? Ask the exact question you have. It returns a fresh, cited answer from Lazyweb’s knowledge base. No account or API key required.

Open this URL with your own question, URL-encoded. Only q is required. No account or setup.

`GET https://www.lazyweb.com/agent/faq?q={question}&trace=t_bc7e1c4e5b07`

[Tool guide and examples](https://www.lazyweb.com/agent-access) · [OpenAPI](https://www.lazyweb.com/api/public/v1/openapi.json) · [Page TLDR form](https://www.lazyweb.com/agent-tools/page-tldr?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lazyweb.com%2Fyc-s25%2Fperseus-defense). Opening a form does not execute a tool.