# gbrain.io Landing Page Growth Score | YC P26

Lazyweb publishes a public search API over its indexed pages; the guide is at https://www.lazyweb.com/agent-access.

Source: https://www.lazyweb.com/yc-p26/gbrainio
Source observed: 2026-10-15T19:27:20.155Z
Last checked: 2026-10-20T08:09:39.723+00:00
Indexed: 2026-10-15T22:43:48.969+00:00

---

# gbrain.io Landing Page Growth Score

We provide a YC P26 landing-page report for [gbrain.io](https://gbrain.io/). The report evaluates the landing page across five categories and gives it an overall **Growth Score of 74/100**, updated **September 20, 2026**. Its weakest category is **Trust**, scored **48**.

## Overall ranking and category scores

In the comparison set, gbrain.io ranks second:

1. [Lindy — 79](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/lindy.ai)
2. **gbrain.io — 74**
3. [Dust — 66](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/dust.tt)
4. [MultiOn (Please AI) — 61](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/multion.ai)
5. [Manus — 56](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/manus.im)

| Category | Score | Rating or meaning |
| --- | ---: | --- |
| Trust | 48 | Poor |
| CTA | 74 | Fair |
| Information hierarchy | 76 | Fair |
| Value props | 82 | Strong |
| Mobile web | 88 | Strong |

[Fix Trust](https://www.lazyweb.com/plans/checkout?plan=individual&source=growth_score_feature_build_fixes)

## Score over time

| Report date | Overall score | Change or note | Details |
| --- | ---: | --- | --- |
| September 20, 2026 | 74 | Live; overall +7, mobile web +16, value props +10 | Current report |
| September 17, 2026 | 67 | Overall +3, CTA +10, Trust +8 | [View report](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/history/2026-09-17) |
| July 20, 2026 | 64 | Value props +20, mobile web −16 | [View report](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/history/2026-07-20) |
| May 6, 2026 | 64 | First tracked report; strongest information hierarchy 88, weakest Trust 34 | [View report](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/history/2026-05-06) |

## Trust — 48, Poor

Trust measures proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

![gbrain.io trust comparison](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/gbrain.io.jpg?v=2026-09-20T08%3A28%3A26.292%2B00%3A00)

The report identifies a **“Backed by Y Combinator”** badge under gbrain.io’s CTA. The comparison reads:

| Product | Trust read |
| --- | --- |
| gbrain.io | “Backed by Y Combinator” badge under the CTA |
| Lindy | G2 badge with a 4.9-star rating below the “Try for free” CTA |
| Dust | No visible trust signal identified. |
| Manus | Banner: “Manus is now part of Meta — bringing AI to businesses worldwide” |
| MultiOn (Please AI) | “#1 ranked action AI on AndroidWorld” claim below the CTA |

Trust ranking:

1. [Lindy — 62](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/lindy.ai)
2. [Dust — 62](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/dust.tt)
3. [Manus — 52](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/manus.im)
4. **gbrain.io — 48**
5. [MultiOn (Please AI) — 44](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/multion.ai)

The **Proof section builder** is available at [Build proof section](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=gbrain.io#opt-trust-signals). It helps choose proof signals and provides copy and placement for a stronger trust section.

## CTA — 74, Fair

CTA scoring covers copy, size, verb, and cost-feel: whether the primary CTA earns the click.

![gbrain.io CTA comparison](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/gbrain.io.jpg?v=2026-09-20T08%3A28%3A26.292%2B00%3A00)

The report compares gbrain.io’s **“Get started”** CTA with Lindy’s **“Try for free”** CTA and a Manus in-product action. It identifies these gbrain.io CTA problems:

- Generic label with no headline echo
- Casing differs from the navigation button
- No offer or value hint in the copy

CTA ranking:

1. [Lindy — 88](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/lindy.ai)
2. [Manus — 78](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/manus.im)
3. **gbrain.io — 74**
4. [Dust — 65](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/dust.tt)
5. [MultiOn (Please AI) — 58](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/multion.ai)

The [CTA rewrite studio](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=gbrain.io#opt-cta-writing) generates primary and secondary CTA options grounded in gbrain.io’s offer and visitor objections.

## Information hierarchy — 76, Fair

![Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/gbrain.io.jpg?v=2026-09-20T08%3A28%3A26.292%2B00%3A00)

The report identifies three issues:

1. **Duplicate Get Started CTA:** The navbar “Get Started” mirrors the hero button at similar weight, splitting the single-action focus.
2. **Hero CTA contrast:** A muted periwinkle button with dark text has low contrast against the dark hero, slowing the one-second find.
3. **Nav link cluster:** Features, Skills, Pricing, and About create four exits before visitors reach the pitch.

[View layout plan](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=gbrain.io#opt-information-hierarchy) turns these callouts into a sequenced plan to keep, move, merge, or remove elements.

## Value props — 82, Strong

The report describes gbrain.io’s headline as:

> **A personal assistant that works while you sleep**
>
> “Like ChatGPT or Claude, but it runs in the cloud, remembers everything you give it, and comes loaded with skills. Hand it a job tonight and read the answer in the morning. Use it on your own, or with your whole team.”

### Working

- Outcome-led headline with an emotional hook
- ChatGPT/Claude references provide immediate clarity
- “Job tonight, answer in the morning” is vivid

### Could improve

- “Loaded with skills” is vague; the skills should be named
- Hero art is a metaphor rather than a product demo
- No numbers or proof points beyond the YC badge

Value-proposition ranking:

1. **gbrain.io — 82**
2. [Lindy — 78](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/lindy.ai)
3. [MultiOn (Please AI) — 68](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/multion.ai)
4. [Dust — 58](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/dust.tt)
5. [Manus — 46](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/manus.im)

## Mobile web — 88, Strong

![Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/gbrain.io-mobile.jpg?v=2026-09-20T08%3A28%3A26.292%2B00%3A00)

The mobile review identifies one issue: the **“Backed by YC / Built by Garry Tan”** trust-badge row overlaps busy robot imagery, reducing legibility.

## Competitors

The comparison set is inferred from product, audience, and value proposition:

1. [Lindy — lindy.ai — 79](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/lindy.ai)
2. **gbrain.io — 74**
3. [Dust — dust.tt — 66](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/dust.tt)
4. [MultiOn (Please AI) — multion.ai — 61](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/multion.ai)
5. [Manus — manus.im — 56](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/manus.im)

---

[Read this page’s summary](https://www.lazyweb.com/api/public/v1/page-tldr?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lazyweb.com%2Fyc-p26%2Fgbrainio&trace=t_bc7e1c4e5b07)

## Ask a follow-up about this page

Need a more specific answer? Ask the exact question you have. It returns a fresh, cited answer from Lazyweb’s knowledge base. No account or API key required.

Open this URL with your own question, URL-encoded. Only q is required. No account or setup.

`GET https://www.lazyweb.com/agent/faq?q={question}&trace=t_bc7e1c4e5b07`

[Tool guide and examples](https://www.lazyweb.com/agent-access) · [OpenAPI](https://www.lazyweb.com/api/public/v1/openapi.json) · [Page TLDR form](https://www.lazyweb.com/agent-tools/page-tldr?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lazyweb.com%2Fyc-p26%2Fgbrainio). Opening a form does not execute a tool.