# nao Labs Landing Page Growth Score | YC P25 | Lazyweb Lazyweb publishes a public search API over its indexed pages; the guide is at https://www.lazyweb.com/agent-access. Source: https://www.lazyweb.com/yc-p25/nao-labs Source observed: 2026-10-17T10:52:24.629Z Last checked: 2026-10-17T10:52:24.629+00:00 Indexed: 2026-10-17T14:25:22.55+00:00 --- # nao Labs Landing Page Growth Score We report a **Growth Score of 74/100** for [nao Labs](https://getnao.io/), updated **September 22, 2026**. The weakest category is **Trust**. ## Overall ranking 1. nao Labs — **74** 2. [Zenlytic](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/zenlytic.com) — **73** 3. [Wren AI](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/getwren.ai) — **72** 4. [Julius AI](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/julius.ai) — **67** 5. [Basejump AI](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/basejump.ai) — **64** 6. [Fabi.ai](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/fabi.ai) — **60** [Fix Trust](https://www.lazyweb.com/plans/checkout?plan=individual&source=growth_score_feature_build_fixes) ## Category scores | Category | Score | Rating | |---|---:|---| | Trust | 62 | Fair | | Value props | 68 | Fair | | Information hierarchy | 78 | Fair | | CTA | 80 | Strong | | Mobile web | 82 | Strong | ## Score over time - **September 22, 2026:** 74; overall +1, CTA +4, value props +2 - [September 3, 2026](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/history/2026-09-03): 73; overall +2, CTA +4, Trust +4 - [July 23, 2026](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/history/2026-07-23): 71; overall −1, mobile web +6, CTA −4 - [June 26, 2026](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/history/2026-06-26): 72; mobile web −6, Trust +4 - [April 30, 2026](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/history/2026-04-30): 72; first tracked report, strongest Mobile web 82 and weakest Trust 58 ## Trust — 62, Fair Trust measures proof that a product is real, competent, and safe to try. Our trust read for nao Labs identifies a product demo with the agent steps “Exploring context: warehouse schema, metrics & models…” and “Executing SQL on your war…”. ![nao Labs trust screenshot](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/getnao.io.jpg?v=2026-09-22T18%3A28%3A06.319%2B00%3A00) For comparison, the captured trust signals are: | Company | Trust read | |---|---| | nao Labs | Product demo showing agent steps “Exploring context: warehouse schema, metrics & models…” and “Executing SQL on your war…” | | Julius AI | Live prompt interface with model selector “Julius 1.2” and capability chips including Browser Agent, Build Website, Video, and Image | | Zenlytic | “TRUSTED BY” logo wall showing Verizon, Chanel, J.Crew, Workday, Domino's, and Eaton | | Fabi.ai | Real product UI screenshot in the hero showing a data table with plan tiers and a “Watch demo (2 min)” overlay | | Basejump AI | No visible trust signal identified | | Wren AI | GitHub badge: “16,678 — #1 GENBI ON GITHUB” | Trust ranking: Wren AI 76, Zenlytic 68, nao Labs 62, Julius AI 52, Fabi.ai 52, and Basejump AI 44. [Build proof section](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=getnao.io#opt-trust-signals) to choose proof signals and get copy and placement for a stronger trust section. ## Value props — 68, Fair We assess whether the title, subtitle, and hero sell the product's true value. nao Labs's headline is: > “the Analytics Agent built for context engineering” The supporting copy is: > “Build your agent context like a file system. Deploy a chat UI for anyone to run analytics on your data.” ### Working - Hero demo shows a file tree, chat, and chart. - Subhead states two concrete capabilities. - “100% Open Source” is a clear trust cue. ### Could improve - “Context engineering” is insider jargon. - No numbers or quantified outcomes are provided. - The headline names a method rather than a payoff. Value-prop ranking: Fabi.ai 76, Wren AI 72, nao Labs 68, Zenlytic 68, Basejump AI 52, and Julius AI 48. ## Information hierarchy — 78, Fair We assess whether the design helps or inhibits the page's message. ![Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/getnao.io.jpg?v=2026-09-22T18%3A28%3A06.319%2B00%3A00) 1. **Eight-link navigation bar:** Product, Pricing, Services, Users, Docs, Resources, plus GitHub create eight exits before the CTA. 2. **Sign in pill:** Its bordered-button weight competes with Get started at the fold's corner. 3. **GitHub 1.7k link:** This outbound social-proof link can take visitors off-site before conversion. [View layout plan](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=getnao.io#opt-information-hierarchy) to turn these callouts into a sequenced keep, move, merge, or remove plan. ## CTA — 80, Strong The nao Labs CTA is **“Get started”**. The review identifies three problems: it does not say “free” despite the open-source offer, its label is generic and does not state a product promise, and its arrow implies leaving to GitHub. ![nao Labs CTA screenshot](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/getnao.io.jpg?v=2026-09-22T18%3A28%3A06.319%2B00%3A00) CTA ranking: Basejump AI 86, nao Labs 80, Julius AI 78, Wren AI 78, Zenlytic 68, and Fabi.ai 62. ## Mobile web — 82, Strong ![Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/getnao.io-mobile.jpg?v=2026-09-22T18%3A28%3A06.319%2B00%3A00) 1. **Get started button:** The desktop-proportioned pill floats at half-column width instead of being a near-full-bleed thumb target. 2. **Clipped chat screenshot:** Text such as “How many users d...” runs off the right edge because the desktop asset was not recomposed for phone width. ## Competitors We infer these competitors from product, audience, and value proposition: 1. nao Labs — 74 2. [Zenlytic](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/zenlytic.com) — 73 3. [Wren AI](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/getwren.ai) — 72 4. [Julius AI](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/julius.ai) — 67 5. [Basejump AI](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/basejump.ai) — 64 6. [Fabi.ai](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/fabi.ai) — 60 --- [Read this page’s summary](https://www.lazyweb.com/api/public/v1/page-tldr?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lazyweb.com%2Fyc-p25%2Fnao-labs&trace=t_bc7e1c4e5b07) ## Ask a follow-up about this page Need a more specific answer? Ask the exact question you have. It returns a fresh, cited answer from Lazyweb’s knowledge base. No account or API key required. Open this URL with your own question, URL-encoded. Only q is required. No account or setup. `GET https://www.lazyweb.com/agent/faq?q={question}&trace=t_bc7e1c4e5b07` [Tool guide and examples](https://www.lazyweb.com/agent-access) · [OpenAPI](https://www.lazyweb.com/api/public/v1/openapi.json) · [Page TLDR form](https://www.lazyweb.com/agent-tools/page-tldr?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lazyweb.com%2Fyc-p25%2Fnao-labs). Opening a form does not execute a tool.