# Klavis AI Landing Page Growth Score | YC P25

Lazyweb publishes a public search API over its indexed pages; the guide is at https://www.lazyweb.com/agent-access.

Source: https://www.lazyweb.com/yc-p25/klavis-ai
Source observed: 2026-10-17T10:19:04.006Z
Last checked: 2026-10-20T07:14:35.795+00:00
Indexed: 2026-10-17T14:07:52.366+00:00

---

# Klavis AI Landing Page Growth Score

We assess the landing page for [Klavis AI](https://www.klavis.ai/) in our YC P25 Growth Score report. The report’s overall score is **68/100**, updated **September 20, 2026**, and identifies **Trust** as the weakest category.

## Overall ranking

Klavis AI ranks **4th** among the six listed products:

1. [Zapier MCP — 80](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/zapier.com)
2. [Composio — 78](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/composio.dev)
3. [Pipedream — 78](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/pipedream.com)
4. Klavis AI — 68
5. [Smithery — 65](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/smithery.ai)
6. [Locus — 62](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/paywithlocus.com)

[Fix Trust](https://www.lazyweb.com/plans/checkout?plan=individual&source=growth_score_feature_build_fixes)

## Category scores

| Category | Score | Rating shown |
| --- | ---: | --- |
| Trust | 55 | Fair |
| CTA | 62 | Fair |
| Value props | 68 | Fair |
| Information hierarchy | 78 | Fair |
| Mobile web | 78 | Fair |

## Score over time

The report history records these observations:

1. **September 20, 2026:** 68; overall +3, Trust +7, Value props +6; live report.
2. [July 3, 2026](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/history/2026-07-03): 65; overall −4, Value props −10, Trust −10.
3. [April 18, 2026](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/history/2026-04-18): 69; overall +1, Information hierarchy +4.
4. [April 3, 2026](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/history/2026-04-03): 68; overall −6, CTA −24, Trust −10.
5. [March 25, 2026](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/history/2026-03-25): 74; first tracked report, strongest CTA 86, weakest Information hierarchy 68.

## Trust — 55, Fair

Trust evaluates proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

![Klavis AI trust capture](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/klavis.ai.jpg?v=2026-09-20T21%3A56%3A18.252%2B00%3A00)

The report’s trust read for Klavis AI is a **“Backed by Y Combinator”** badge with a GitHub **“5.8k ★”** pill above the headline. The comparison examples include:

- Locus: an MCP install widget with `claude mcp add --transport http locus-pro` and **“OAUTH · NO API KEYS”**.
- Composio: customer logos for HubSpot, wabi, agent.ai, and Zoom.
- Pipedream: an **“A Workday Company”** mark.
- Zapier MCP: a **“Trusted by the world's best companies”** logo wall, including NVIDIA, Google, Meta, Lowe's, Allstate, Samsung, Mastercard, HP, and a truncated “Expe” entry in the supplied text.
- Smithery: MCP server cards with usage counts such as **“Exa Search — 9.18k uses”** and **“OneSignal — 22.49k uses”**.

Trust comparison scores:

1. Zapier MCP — 84
2. Composio — 68
3. Pipedream — 62
4. Smithery — 62
5. Klavis AI — 55
6. Locus — 44

The **Proof section builder** is marked **PRO**: [Build proof section](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=klavis.ai#opt-trust-signals). It offers copy and placement guidance for a stronger trust section.

## CTA — 62, Fair

![Klavis AI CTA comparison capture](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/klavis.ai.jpg?v=2026-09-20T21%3A56%3A18.252%2B00%3A00)

The CTA review covers copy, size, verb, and cost-feel. The reported problems are:

- The click feels costly because it leads to a sales call.
- No value is promised for the click.
- The CTA competes with the header **“Sign Up”**.
- The label is generic and ignores the headline.

CTA comparison scores:

1. Locus — 84
2. Pipedream — 84
3. Zapier MCP — 84
4. Composio — 82
5. Smithery — 72
6. Klavis AI — 62

The **CTA rewrite studio** is marked **PRO**: [Rewrite this CTA](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=klavis.ai#opt-cta-writing). It generates primary and secondary CTA options grounded in Klavis AI’s offer and visitor objections.

## Value props — 68, Fair

The review describes Klavis AI’s headline as underselling the offer:

> **“High Quality Coding & Agentic Data”**
>
> “Long-horizon tasks, programmatic verification, and granular rewards”

### Working

- The subhead names three concrete differentiators.
- The category is immediately clear to target buyers.
- YC and GitHub-star badges add credibility.

### Could improve

- **“High Quality”** is an unbacked adjective.
- No dataset scale or numbers appear.
- The hero is empty and does not show the data itself.

Value-proposition comparison scores:

1. Pipedream — 84
2. Composio — 75
3. Zapier MCP — 72
4. Smithery — 72
5. Klavis AI — 68
6. Locus — 62

## Information hierarchy — 78, Fair

![Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/klavis.ai.jpg?v=2026-09-20T21%3A56%3A18.252%2B00%3A00)

The review identifies three fold-level priorities:

1. **Sign Up button:** It is styled like the primary CTA, splitting visitors between **“Sign Up”** and **“Contact Us”**.
2. **GitHub stars badge:** The outbound GitHub link sits directly above the headline and can invite an exit before the value proposition lands.
3. **Contact Us CTA:** The label reads like a support link rather than a conversion action, weakening the fold’s single scan-path anchor.

The **Layout priority plan** is marked **PRO**: [View layout plan](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=klavis.ai#opt-information-hierarchy). It turns these callouts into a sequenced plan to keep, move, merge, or remove elements.

## Mobile web — 78, Fair

![Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/klavis.ai-mobile.jpg?v=2026-09-20T21%3A56%3A18.252%2B00%3A00)

The mobile review identifies:

1. **Contact Us button:** The desktop-proportioned button occupies approximately 60% width instead of being a full-bleed thumb target.
2. **Header Sign Up button:** It competes with the hero’s **Contact Us** button for the first tap, splitting the primary action.

The **Mobile fix plan** is marked **PRO**: [View mobile fixes](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=klavis.ai#opt-mobile-web). It converts the findings into a prioritized implementation checklist.

## Competitors

The report says these competitors are inferred from product, audience, and value proposition:

1. [Zapier MCP — zapier.com — 80](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/zapier.com)
2. [Composio — composio.dev — 78](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/composio.dev)
3. [Pipedream — pipedream.com — 78](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/pipedream.com)
4. Klavis AI — 68
5. [Smithery — smithery.ai — 65](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/smithery.ai)
6. [Locus — paywithlocus.com — 62](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/paywithlocus.com)

---

[Read this page’s summary](https://www.lazyweb.com/api/public/v1/page-tldr?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lazyweb.com%2Fyc-p25%2Fklavis-ai&trace=t_bc7e1c4e5b07)

## Ask a follow-up about this page

Need a more specific answer? Ask the exact question you have. It returns a fresh, cited answer from Lazyweb’s knowledge base. No account or API key required.

Open this URL with your own question, URL-encoded. Only q is required. No account or setup.

`GET https://www.lazyweb.com/agent/faq?q={question}&trace=t_bc7e1c4e5b07`

[Tool guide and examples](https://www.lazyweb.com/agent-access) · [OpenAPI](https://www.lazyweb.com/api/public/v1/openapi.json) · [Page TLDR form](https://www.lazyweb.com/agent-tools/page-tldr?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lazyweb.com%2Fyc-p25%2Fklavis-ai). Opening a form does not execute a tool.