# Clidey Landing Page Growth Score | YC P25 | Lazyweb

Lazyweb publishes a public search API over its indexed pages; the guide is at https://www.lazyweb.com/agent-access.

Source: https://www.lazyweb.com/yc-p25/clidey
Source observed: 2026-10-15T20:55:00.832Z
Last checked: 2026-10-20T06:57:54.757+00:00
Indexed: 2026-10-16T00:19:14.254+00:00

---

# Clidey landing page growth report

We report on [Clidey](https://clidey.com/) in the YC P25 comparison. Clidey is the company behind WhoDB and open-source developer tools. Its stated positioning is: “Building software that brings clarity to your data.” Clidey says it builds modern data infrastructure for engineering and data teams to operate with complete confidence.

[← Back to YC P25](https://www.lazyweb.com/yc-p25)

## Overall result

Clidey’s growth score is **63/100**, updated **September 21, 2026**. Its weakest category is **Trust**, scored **42**.

[Fix Value props and trust](https://www.lazyweb.com/plans/checkout?plan=individual&source=growth_score_feature_build_fixes)

### Category scores

| Category | Score |
|---|---:|
| Trust | [42](https://www.lazyweb.com/yc-p25/clidey#gs-trust) |
| Value props | [58](https://www.lazyweb.com/yc-p25/clidey#gs-value_props) |
| Mobile web | [64](https://www.lazyweb.com/yc-p25/clidey#gs-mobile_web) |
| CTA | [72](https://www.lazyweb.com/yc-p25/clidey#gs-cta) |
| Information hierarchy | [78](https://www.lazyweb.com/yc-p25/clidey#gs-information_hierarchy) |

### Overall comparison

1. [Beekeeper Studio — 80](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/beekeeperstudio.io)
2. [TablePlus — 72](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/tableplus.com)
3. Clidey — 63
4. [Adminer — 62](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/adminer.org)
5. [DBeaver — 54](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/dbeaver.io)

## Score over time

The available reports are:

1. **September 21, 2026 — 63:** live report; overall −2, Trust −14, Value props +10.
2. [June 24, 2026 — 65](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/history/2026-06-24): Value props −4, Trust +4.
3. [June 6, 2026 — 65](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/history/2026-06-06): first tracked report; strongest Information hierarchy at 78 and weakest Value props at 52.

## Trust — 42, Poor

Trust measures proof that a product is real, competent, and safe to try.

![Clidey trust comparison](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/clidey.com.jpg?v=2026-09-21T07%3A43%3A09.755%2B00%3A00)

The trust comparison identifies these signals:

| Company | Trust read |
|---|---|
| Clidey | A GitHub link in the navigation signals open-source code. |
| DBeaver | A GitHub star counter shows “Star 51,574”. |
| Beekeeper Studio | A “Trusted by teams at” logo row shows NHS, NVIDIA, Sony, BBC, Delta, LinkedIn, Hitachi, and HP. |
| TablePlus | A real database GUI screenshot is shown on laptop and phone mockups. |
| Adminer | A “Screenshots” section shows twelve real product UI captures, including login, table structure, and export dialogs. |

### Trust comparison ranking

1. Beekeeper Studio — 82
2. DBeaver — 62
3. TablePlus — 58
4. Adminer — 58
5. Clidey — 42

[Build proof section](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=clidey.com#opt-trust-signals) to choose proof signals and receive copy and placement for a stronger trust section.

## Value props — 58, Fair

This category evaluates whether the title, subtitle, and hero sell the product’s true value.

**Clidey’s headline:** “Building software that brings clarity to your data.”

**Subhead:** “Clidey is the company behind WhoDB and open-source developer tools. We build modern data infrastructure that helps engineering and data teams operate with complete confidence.”

### Working

- Names an outcome: clarity from data.
- Names WhoDB and the audience in the subhead.
- Adds an emotional note: complete confidence.

### Could improve

- The headline could describe any data tool.
- There are no numbers or proof points anywhere.
- The hero has empty space and shows no product.

### Value-proposition ranking

1. Beekeeper Studio — 76
2. TablePlus — 72
3. DBeaver — 68
4. Adminer — 68
5. Clidey — 58

## Mobile web — 64, Fair

This category evaluates the phone experience as a first-class experience.

![Mobile web annotations on the Clidey capture](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/clidey.com-mobile.jpg?v=2026-09-21T07%3A43%3A09.755%2B00%3A00)

1. **Six-line hero headline:** The headline is barely scaled down from desktop and wraps into six tall lines, consuming most of the first viewport.
2. **Explore WhoDB button:** The primary CTA sits at the bottom edge at half-column width rather than using a thumb-friendly full-bleed button.
3. **Five-line body paragraph:** The long introductory paragraph stacks beneath the oversized headline and pushes both CTAs toward the fold’s edge.

[View mobile fixes](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=clidey.com#opt-mobile-web) for a prioritized implementation checklist.

## CTA — 72, Fair

This category evaluates CTA copy, size, verb, and cost-feel.

![Clidey CTA comparison](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/clidey.com.jpg?v=2026-09-21T07%3A43%3A09.755%2B00%3A00)

Clidey’s primary CTA is **“Explore WhoDB”**.

### Problems

- “Explore” is vague and does not state an outcome.
- It does not say “free,” despite the open-source positioning.
- It does not echo the “clarity” promise.

### CTA ranking

1. Beekeeper Studio — 86
2. TablePlus — 80
3. Clidey — 72
4. Adminer — 72
5. DBeaver — 48

[Rewrite this CTA](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=clidey.com#opt-cta-writing) for primary and secondary options grounded in Clidey’s offer and visitor objections.

## Information hierarchy — 78, Fair

This category evaluates whether the design helps or inhibits the page’s message.

![Information hierarchy annotations on the Clidey desktop capture](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/clidey.com.jpg?v=2026-09-21T07%3A43%3A09.755%2B00%3A00)

1. **Navigation link row:** Four exits plus GitHub draw attention before the primary CTA, and “WhoDB” duplicates the button’s destination.
2. **Browse open source button:** It is the same size as the primary CTA, splitting the main action into a two-way choice.
3. **GitHub navigation link:** This outbound exit occupies the top-right terminal scan position, the strongest secondary slot on the fold.

[View layout plan](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=clidey.com#opt-information-hierarchy) for a sequenced keep, move, merge, or remove plan.

## Competitors

These competitors are inferred from product, audience, and value proposition.

| Rank | Company | Domain | Score |
|---:|---|---|---:|
| 1 | [Beekeeper Studio](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/beekeeperstudio.io) | beekeeperstudio.io | 80 |
| 2 | [TablePlus](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/tableplus.com) | tableplus.com | 72 |
| 3 | Clidey | clidey.com | 63 |
| 4 | [Adminer](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/adminer.org) | adminer.org | 62 |
| 5 | [DBeaver](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/dbeaver.io) | dbeaver.io | 54 |
| — | [CloudBeaver](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/cloudbeaver.io) | cloudbeaver.io | failed |

---

[Read this page’s summary](https://www.lazyweb.com/api/public/v1/page-tldr?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lazyweb.com%2Fyc-p25%2Fclidey&trace=t_bc7e1c4e5b07)

## Ask a follow-up about this page

Need a more specific answer? Ask the exact question you have. It returns a fresh, cited answer from Lazyweb’s knowledge base. No account or API key required.

Open this URL with your own question, URL-encoded. Only q is required. No account or setup.

`GET https://www.lazyweb.com/agent/faq?q={question}&trace=t_bc7e1c4e5b07`

[Tool guide and examples](https://www.lazyweb.com/agent-access) · [OpenAPI](https://www.lazyweb.com/api/public/v1/openapi.json) · [Page TLDR form](https://www.lazyweb.com/agent-tools/page-tldr?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lazyweb.com%2Fyc-p25%2Fclidey). Opening a form does not execute a tool.