# Clarm Landing Page Growth Score — YC P25

Lazyweb publishes a public search API over its indexed pages; the guide is at https://www.lazyweb.com/agent-access.

Source: https://www.lazyweb.com/yc-p25/clarm
Source observed: 2026-10-15T20:16:20.173Z
Last checked: 2026-10-20T08:46:50.021+00:00
Indexed: 2026-10-15T23:49:58.758+00:00

---

# Clarm landing page growth score

We provide a Growth Score report for [Clarm](https://www.clarm.com/) as part of YC P25. Clarm’s product is described here as **Clarm Atlas**, which lets non-technical teams build AI coworker agents from building blocks pre-approved by IT and compliance, then deploy complete agents into production.

## Overall result

Clarm’s overall Growth Score is **67/100**, updated **September 22, 2026**. The weakest category is **Trust**, scored **44/100** and labeled **Poor**. The category scores are:

| Category | Score | Rating shown |
|---|---:|---|
| Trust | 44 | Poor |
| CTA | 68 | Fair |
| Mobile web | 70 | Fair |
| Value props | 76 | Fair |
| Information hierarchy | 78 | Fair |

### Overall ranking

1. [Lindy — 79](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/lindy.ai)
2. [Gumloop — 72](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/gumloop.com)
3. [Relevance AI — 70](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/relevanceai.com)
4. [StackAI — 70](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/stack-ai.com)
5. Clarm — 67
6. [Dust — 66](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/dust.tt)

[Fix Trust](https://www.lazyweb.com/plans/checkout?plan=individual&source=growth_score_feature_build_fixes)

## Score over time

The report shows these tracked reports:

1. **September 22, 2026 — 67**, live; overall **+1**, Information hierarchy **+6**, Trust **−4**.
2. [July 8, 2026 — 66](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/history/2026-07-08); overall **−4**, Mobile web **−10**, Information hierarchy **−6**.
3. [June 4, 2026 — 70](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/history/2026-06-04); first tracked report, with strongest Information hierarchy at **78** and weakest Trust at **48**.

## Trust — 44/100, Poor

Trust measures proof that a product is real, competent, and safe to try.

![Clarm trust screenshot](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/clarm.com.jpg?v=2026-09-22T15%3A37%3A06.581%2B00%3A00)

The comparison captures identify these trust signals:

| Company | Trust read |
|---|---|
| Clarm | “Backed by Y Combinator” badge above the headline |
| Relevance AI | No visible trust signal identified. |
| Lindy | G2 badge with a 4.9-star rating below the “Try for free” CTA |
| Dust | No visible trust signal identified. |
| Gumloop | “We raised a $50M Series B led by Benchmark” banner |
| StackAI | “TRUSTED BY” logo strip featuring BAE Systems on the mobile capture |

Trust ranking:

1. Gumloop — 68
2. StackAI — 64
3. Lindy — 62
4. Dust — 62
5. Relevance AI — 55
6. Clarm — 44

The **Proof section builder** is a Pro feature for choosing trust signals and generating copy and placement for a stronger trust section: [Build proof section](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=clarm.com#opt-trust-signals).

## CTA — 68/100, Fair

CTA scoring considers copy, size, verb, and cost-feel: whether the primary CTA earns the click.

![Clarm CTA comparison screenshot](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/clarm.com.jpg?v=2026-09-22T15%3A37%3A06.581%2B00%3A00)

The captured primary CTAs are:

- Clarm: **“Book a pilot →”**
- Lindy: **“Try for free”**
- Gumloop: **“Get Started”**
- StackAI: **“Get a Demo”**

Problems identified with Clarm’s CTA:

- “Book” implies a costly sales call.
- It ignores the “1 min Clarm’s first agent” hook.
- “Pilot” is vendor jargon.

CTA ranking:

1. Lindy — 88
2. Gumloop — 72
3. StackAI — 72
4. Clarm — 68
5. Dust — 65
6. Relevance AI — 62

The **CTA rewrite studio** is a Pro feature that generates primary and secondary CTA options grounded in Clarm’s offer and visitor objections: [Rewrite this CTA](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=clarm.com#opt-cta-writing).

## Mobile web — 70/100, Fair

This category evaluates the phone experience as a first-class citizen.

![Mobile web annotations on the Clarm capture](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/clarm.com-mobile.jpg?v=2026-09-22T15%3A37%3A06.581%2B00%3A00)

Findings:

1. **Clipped chip row:** the “Policy training” chip is cut mid-word at the viewport edge, with no scroll affordance.
2. **Chat bubble overlay:** the floating chat button covers body copy and adds a dead blocker with no conversion value.

The **Mobile fix plan** is a Pro feature that converts these findings into a prioritized implementation checklist: [View mobile fixes](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=clarm.com#opt-mobile-web).

## Value props — 76/100, Fair

This category asks whether the title, subtitle, and hero sell the product’s true value.

### Clarm’s headline

> Build an AI coworker for the work your team still does by hand.

Clarm Atlas is described as follows:

> Clarm Atlas lets non-technical teams build AI coworker agents using building blocks pre-approved by IT and compliance, giving teams the freedom to deploy complete agents straight into production.

What is working:

- “Still does by hand” addresses a real pain point.
- The copy names the buyer: non-technical teams.
- The **1 min / 1 hour / 1 week** ladder is concrete.

What could improve:

- The hero grid shows nothing about the product.
- Task chips are unexplained labels.
- The subhead is one long 33-word sentence.

Value-prop ranking:

1. Relevance AI — 80
2. Lindy — 78
3. Clarm — 76
4. StackAI — 68
5. Dust — 58
6. Gumloop — 52

## Information hierarchy — 78/100, Fair

This category evaluates whether the design helps or inhibits what the page is trying to say.

![Information hierarchy annotations on the Clarm desktop capture](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/clarm.com.jpg?v=2026-09-22T15%3A37%3A06.581%2B00%3A00)

Findings:

1. **“See how Atlas works”:** the secondary button matches the primary button’s size and weight, splitting the fold’s one-click decision.
2. **Capability pill row:** six equal-weight chips read as a feature index and add a competing message between the subhead and CTA.
3. **Wireframe card grid:** the hero visual uses abstract grey placeholders that communicate nothing about the product’s outcome.

The **Layout priority plan** is a Pro feature that turns these callouts into a sequenced page plan—keep, move, merge, or remove: [View layout plan](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=clarm.com#opt-information-hierarchy).

## Competitors

The report infers competitors from product, audience, and value proposition:

1. [Lindy — lindy.ai — 79](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/lindy.ai)
2. [Gumloop — gumloop.com — 72](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/gumloop.com)
3. [Relevance AI — relevanceai.com — 70](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/relevanceai.com)
4. [StackAI — stack-ai.com — 70](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/stack-ai.com)
5. Clarm — 67
6. [Dust — dust.tt — 66](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/dust.tt)

---

[Read this page’s summary](https://www.lazyweb.com/api/public/v1/page-tldr?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lazyweb.com%2Fyc-p25%2Fclarm&trace=t_bc7e1c4e5b07)

## Ask a follow-up about this page

Need a more specific answer? Ask the exact question you have. It returns a fresh, cited answer from Lazyweb’s knowledge base. No account or API key required.

Open this URL with your own question, URL-encoded. Only q is required. No account or setup.

`GET https://www.lazyweb.com/agent/faq?q={question}&trace=t_bc7e1c4e5b07`

[Tool guide and examples](https://www.lazyweb.com/agent-access) · [OpenAPI](https://www.lazyweb.com/api/public/v1/openapi.json) · [Page TLDR form](https://www.lazyweb.com/agent-tools/page-tldr?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lazyweb.com%2Fyc-p25%2Fclarm). Opening a form does not execute a tool.