# Adentris landing-page Growth Score report

Lazyweb publishes a public search API over its indexed pages; the guide is at https://www.lazyweb.com/agent-access.

Source: https://www.lazyweb.com/yc-p25/adentris
Source observed: 2026-10-15T19:46:35.080Z
Last checked: 2026-10-20T08:19:43.052+00:00
Indexed: 2026-10-15T23:36:22.013+00:00

---

# Adentris landing-page Growth Score

We assessed the public landing page for [Adentris](https://www.adentris.com/) in the YC P25 comparison.

## Overall result

Adentris has a **Growth Score of 69/100**, updated **September 22, 2026**. Its weakest category is **Trust**, scored **58**.

| Category | Score |
|---|---:|
| Trust | 58 |
| CTA | 64 |
| Mobile web | 68 |
| Information hierarchy | 72 |
| Value props | 82 |

[Fix Trust](https://www.lazyweb.com/plans/checkout?plan=individual&source=growth_score_feature_build_fixes)

## Ranking

| Rank | Company | Growth Score |
|---:|---|---:|
| 1 | [Fathom](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/fathomhealth.com) | 75 |
| 2 | Adentris | 69 |
| 3 | [CodaMetrix](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/codametrix.com) | 67 |
| 4 | [Nym Health](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/nym.health) | 67 |
| 5 | [AKASA](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/akasa.com) | 64 |
| 6 | [MDaudit](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/mdaudit.com) | 63 |

## Score over time

- **September 22, 2026:** 69; overall +1, CTA −12, mobile web +10.
- **September 8, 2026:** 68; first tracked report. Strongest category was Value props at 78; weakest was Trust at 58. [View the history](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/history/2026-09-08).

## Trust — 58, Fair

Trust measures proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

![Adentris trust comparison capture](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/adentris.com.jpg?v=2026-09-22T20%3A26%3A40.738%2B00%3A00)

The visible Adentris trust signal is the outcome statistic **“73 → 96% documentation accuracy pre-submission, customer data.”** The comparison table records these trust signals:

| Company | Trust read |
|---|---|
| Adentris | “73 → 96% documentation accuracy pre-submission, customer data” outcome stat |
| CodaMetrix | “2026 Best in KLAS for Autonomous Medical Coding” award banner with badge |
| Nym Health | No visible trust signal identified. |
| MDaudit | No visible trust signal identified. |
| Fathom | KLAS banner: “Fathom earns highest overall score” |
| AKASA | No visible trust signal identified. |

Trust ranking: Fathom 76, CodaMetrix 62, Adentris 58, Nym Health 42, MDaudit 42, and AKASA 42.

[Build proof section](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=adentris.com#opt-trust-signals) to choose proof signals and get copy and placement for a stronger trust section.

## CTA — 64, Fair

This category evaluates CTA copy, size, verb, and cost-feel.

![Adentris CTA comparison capture](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/adentris.com.jpg?v=2026-09-22T20%3A26%3A40.738%2B00%3A00)

The visible CTA comparison includes Adentris’s **“Request a demo”**, alongside Nym Health’s **“See Nym’s Engine in Action,”** Fathom’s **“Get Started,”** and MDaudit’s **“Talk to an Expert.”** Identified problems for Adentris are:

- The demo request feels costly.
- The free offer is demoted to a ghost button.
- The navigation primary conflicts with the hero primary.

CTA ranking: Nym Health 72, Fathom 72, MDaudit 68, Adentris 64, CodaMetrix 64, and AKASA 62.

[Rewrite this CTA](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=adentris.com#opt-cta-writing) for primary and secondary options grounded in Adentris’s offer and visitor objections.

## Mobile web — 68, Fair

The mobile-web review focuses on making the phone experience a first-class citizen.

![Mobile web annotations on the Adentris capture](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/adentris.com-mobile.jpg?v=2026-09-22T20%3A26%3A40.738%2B00%3A00)

1. **Six-line subhead paragraph:** Desktop-length copy fills half the viewport and pushes the primary CTA far down the fold.
2. **Side-by-side CTA pair:** Two half-width buttons compete; neither is the thumb-friendly full-bleed tap target mobile deserves.
3. **Truncated stat labels:** The **73→96%** and **−62%** stats wrap into cramped columns and clip mid-word at the fold edge.

[View mobile fixes](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=adentris.com#opt-mobile-web) for a prioritized implementation checklist.

## Information hierarchy — 72, Fair

![Information hierarchy annotations on the Adentris capture](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/adentris.com.jpg?v=2026-09-22T20%3A26%3A40.738%2B00%3A00)

1. **Dueling hero CTAs:** “Request a demo” and “Start for Free” sit side by side at similar size, splitting the one action the fold wants.
2. **Header Start for Free:** A primary-styled pill duplicates the hero’s secondary action and pulls scans to the top-right before the value proposition lands.
3. **Seven-item navigation row:** Home through Company offers seven equal-weight exits before the visitor reaches a conversion action.
4. **Overlapping mockup toast:** The Documentation integrity popup covers the module list, cluttering the mockup’s left rail and muddying its story.

[View layout plan](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=adentris.com#opt-information-hierarchy) to turn these callouts into a sequenced keep, move, merge, or remove plan.

## Value props — 82, Strong

The reviewed headline is **“The AI platform for revenue integrity and compliance.”** The subhead says: **“Continuously audit every chart, every claim, and every prior auth in real time, across any EHR, with no integration project required. Hospitals, health systems, and behavioral health networks use Adentris to recover revenue, prevent denials.”**

The review identifies these strengths:

- Concrete stats: **96% accuracy** and **−62% denials**.
- The subhead addresses the integration objection.
- The hero image shows real claim audits and dollars.

Potential improvements identified:

- The headline describes a category rather than an outcome.
- “AI platform for” is generic framing.
- The subhead is long and dense across two sentences.

Value-proposition ranking: Adentris 82, Nym Health 72, Fathom 68, AKASA 66, CodaMetrix 64, and MDaudit 62.

## Competitors

The comparison is inferred from product, audience, and value proposition.

1. [Fathom — fathomhealth.com — 75](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/fathomhealth.com)
2. Adentris — 69
3. [CodaMetrix — codametrix.com — 67](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/codametrix.com)
4. [Nym Health — nym.health — 67](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/nym.health)
5. [AKASA — akasa.com — 64](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/akasa.com)
6. [MDaudit — mdaudit.com — 63](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/mdaudit.com)

The report was observed on **October 15, 2026**; the report itself says it was updated **September 22, 2026**.

---

[Read this page’s summary](https://www.lazyweb.com/api/public/v1/page-tldr?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lazyweb.com%2Fyc-p25%2Fadentris&trace=t_bc7e1c4e5b07)

## Ask a follow-up about this page

Need a more specific answer? Ask the exact question you have. It returns a fresh, cited answer from Lazyweb’s knowledge base. No account or API key required.

Open this URL with your own question, URL-encoded. Only q is required. No account or setup.

`GET https://www.lazyweb.com/agent/faq?q={question}&trace=t_bc7e1c4e5b07`

[Tool guide and examples](https://www.lazyweb.com/agent-access) · [OpenAPI](https://www.lazyweb.com/api/public/v1/openapi.json) · [Page TLDR form](https://www.lazyweb.com/agent-tools/page-tldr?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lazyweb.com%2Fyc-p25%2Fadentris). Opening a form does not execute a tool.