# Zalos landing-page growth score Lazyweb publishes a public search API over its indexed pages; the guide is at https://www.lazyweb.com/agent-access. Source: https://www.lazyweb.com/yc-f25/zalos Source observed: 2026-09-30T02:41:59.281Z Last checked: 2026-10-17T09:38:57.514+00:00 Indexed: 2026-09-30T06:49:23.855+00:00 --- # Zalos landing-page growth score We analyzed [Zalos](https://www.zalos.ai/) in the YC F25 comparison. The overall Growth Score is **67/100**, updated **September 22, 2026**. The weakest category is **Trust**. ## Overall and category scores | Category | Score | Rating | |---|---:|---| | Trust | 48 | Poor | | CTA | 68 | Fair | | Mobile web | 68 | Fair | | Value props | 72 | Fair | | Information hierarchy | 78 | Fair | [Fix Trust](https://www.lazyweb.com/plans/checkout?plan=individual&source=growth_score_feature_build_fixes) ## Score over time | Date | Overall | Changes or note | Report | |---|---:|---|---| | September 22, 2026 | 67 | Live; Mobile web −14; Value props +10 | — | | September 3, 2026 | 67 | Overall −1; Information hierarchy −6; Value props −6 | [View report](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/history/2026-09-03) | | June 4, 2026 | 68 | Overall +1; Value props +6; Information hierarchy +4 | [View report](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/history/2026-06-04) | | May 17, 2026 | 67 | First tracked report; strongest Information hierarchy 78; weakest Trust 54 | [View report](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/history/2026-05-17) | ## Trust — 48, Poor Trust measures proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try. ![Zalos trust example](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/zalos.ai-mobile.jpg?v=2026-09-22T00%3A28%3A41.963%2B00%3A00) ![Rogo trust example](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/rogo.ai.jpg?v=2026-09-20T04%3A31%3A29.851%2B00%3A00) ![Auditoria.AI trust example](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/auditoria.ai.jpg?v=2026-09-22T00%3A40%3A38.503%2B00%3A00) ![Concourse trust example](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/concourse.co.jpg?v=2026-09-22T00%3A50%3A20.871%2B00%3A00) | Company | Trust read | |---|---| | Zalos | “Trusted by industry leaders” logo strip at the bottom of the mobile fold. | | Rogo | Customer/partner logo strip: Tiger Global, Moelis, Nomura, Société Générale, Rothschild & Co, BNP Paribas, and Raymond James. | | Auditoria.AI | “Trusted by enterprise finance” logo bar with Match Group, Iowa State University, Skyscanner, and Memorial Sloan Ketteri. | | Concourse | “WORKING WITH 100+ FINANCE DEPARTMENTS” logo strip with Palo Alto Networks, Tempo, Carrot, and Lightmatter. | | Numeric | Customer logo bar with Asana, Riskified, Iterable, Benchling, Wealthfront, Zip, and “Case Study” links. | | Doconomy... skip | No visible trust signal identified. | Our Trust comparison ranks Numeric **#1 at 80**, Rogo **#2 at 72**, Auditoria.AI **#3 at 72**, Concourse **#4 at 62**, Zalos **#5 at 48**, and Doconomy... skip **#6 at 12**. [Build proof section](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=zalos.ai#opt-trust-signals) ## CTA — 68, Fair ![Zalos in-product CTA analysis](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/zalos.ai.jpg?v=2026-09-22T00%3A28%3A41.963%2B00%3A00) ![Rogo CTA example](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/rogo.ai.jpg?v=2026-09-20T04%3A31%3A29.851%2B00%3A00) ![Numeric CTA example](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/numeric.io.jpg?v=2026-09-21T00%3A10%3A25.615%2B00%3A00) The report identifies these CTA problems: - The submit control is icon-only and has no payoff label. - Demo framing implies a sales gate. - **“Get a demo”** and **“Request a Demo”** use different labels. - It is unclear what submitting delivers. Our CTA comparison ranks Rogo **#1 at 72**, Numeric **#2 at 72**, Zalos **#3 at 68**, Auditoria.AI **#4 at 62**, Concourse **#5 at 62**, and Doconomy... skip **#6 at 40**. [Rewrite this CTA](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=zalos.ai#opt-cta-writing) ## Mobile web — 68, Fair ![Zalos mobile-web annotations](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/zalos.ai-mobile.jpg?v=2026-09-22T00%3A28%3A41.963%2B00%3A00) 1. **Get a demo button:** The desktop-proportioned pill floats small in the column instead of being a full-width thumb target. 2. **Five-line subhead:** The serif headline barely scales down, wraps into cramped lines, and pushes the CTA down the fold. [View mobile fixes](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=zalos.ai#opt-mobile-web) ## Value props — 72, Fair Our headline is: > **“The finance agent factory.”** > > “Build AI workforces that run finance workflows across fragmented systems” ### Working - “Fragmented systems” names a real finance pain. - The prompt box demonstrates a concrete job: month-end close. - The category is clear: AI agents for finance. ### Could improve - No numbers or measurable outcomes. - The “factory” metaphor needs insider context. - No emotional payoff, such as relief or time saved. Our Value Props comparison ranks Auditoria.AI **#1 at 76**, Numeric **#2 at 76**, Zalos **#3 at 72**, Rogo **#4 at 58**, Concourse **#5 at 42**, and Doconomy... skip **#6 at 42**. ## Information hierarchy — 78, Fair ![Zalos information-hierarchy annotations](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/zalos.ai.jpg?v=2026-09-22T00%3A28%3A41.963%2B00%3A00) 1. **Prompt box versus CTA:** The interactive prompt has its own submit arrow and competes directly with **“Get a demo”** below it, splitting the primary action. 2. **Duplicate demo CTA:** **“Request a Demo”** in the navigation duplicates **“Get a demo”** in the hero with different labels, diluting one conversion path. 3. **Careers/Newsroom links:** Non-buyer navigation items divert first-visit attention from demo conversion. 4. **Add context button:** A third styled control inside the fold has an unclear pre-engagement purpose and adds decision noise. [View layout plan](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=zalos.ai#opt-information-hierarchy) ## Competitors | Rank | Company | Growth score | Destination | |---:|---|---:|---| | 1 | Numeric | 78 | [Growth score](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/numeric.io) | | 2 | Rogo | 72 | [Growth score](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/rogo.ai) | | 3 | Auditoria.AI | 68 | [Growth score](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/auditoria.ai) | | 4 | Zalos | 67 | [https://www.zalos.ai/](https://www.zalos.ai/) | | 5 | Concourse | 64 | [Growth score](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/concourse.co) | | 6 | Doconomy... skip | 38 | [Growth score](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/example.com) | [Back to YC F25](https://www.lazyweb.com/yc-f25) --- [Read this page’s summary](https://www.lazyweb.com/api/public/v1/page-tldr?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lazyweb.com%2Fyc-f25%2Fzalos&trace=t_bc7e1c4e5b07) ## Ask a follow-up about this page Need a more specific answer? Ask the exact question you have. It returns a fresh, cited answer from Lazyweb’s knowledge base. No account or API key required. Open this URL with your own question, URL-encoded. Only q is required. No account or setup. `GET https://www.lazyweb.com/agent/faq?q={question}&trace=t_bc7e1c4e5b07` [Tool guide and examples](https://www.lazyweb.com/agent-access) · [OpenAPI](https://www.lazyweb.com/api/public/v1/openapi.json) · [Page TLDR form](https://www.lazyweb.com/agent-tools/page-tldr?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lazyweb.com%2Fyc-f25%2Fzalos). Opening a form does not execute a tool.