# Lunavo landing-page Growth Score report | YC F25

Lazyweb publishes a public search API over its indexed pages; the guide is at https://www.lazyweb.com/agent-access.

Source: https://www.lazyweb.com/yc-f25/lunavo
Source observed: 2026-09-30T02:38:40.435Z
Last checked: 2026-10-20T06:56:26.158+00:00
Indexed: 2026-09-30T06:52:19.853+00:00

---

# Lunavo landing-page Growth Score report

[Open Lunavo](https://lunavo.ai/) · [Back to YC F25](https://www.lazyweb.com/yc-f25)

## Overall result

Our landing page has a **Growth Score of 73/100**, updated **September 22, 2026**. Our weakest category is **Trust**, scored **44/100**. The category scores are:

| Category | Score | Assessment |
|---|---:|---|
| Trust | 44 | Poor |
| CTA | 72 | Fair |
| Mobile web | 78 | Fair |
| Information hierarchy | 84 | Strong |
| Value props | 86 | Strong |

[Fix Trust](https://www.lazyweb.com/plans/checkout?plan=individual&source=growth_score_feature_build_fixes)

## Growth Score ranking

| Rank | Company | Score |
|---:|---|---:|
| 1 | [Cargofive](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/cargofive.com) | 74 |
| 2 | Lunavo | 73 |
| 3 | [Vooma](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/vooma.com) | 72 |
| 4 | [Levity](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/levity.ai) | 71 |
| 5 | [Happyrobot](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/happyrobot.ai) | 66 |

## Score over time

The report includes a score-history chart with series for Lunavo, Happyrobot, Levity, Vooma, Augment, and Cargofive. The visible chart highlights the latest Lunavo point at the September 22 observation.

## Trust — 44/100, Poor

Trust measures proof that a product is real, competent, and safe to try.

![Lunavo trust-section capture](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/lunavo.ai.jpg?v=2026-09-22T16%3A03%3A05.13%2B00%3A00)

The trust comparison includes these visible proof signals:

| Company | Trust read |
|---|---|
| Lunavo | “Live at European freight forwarders. Scales with thousands of orders a day and frees your team's time for the work that” |
| Happyrobot | “HAPPYROBOT RAISES ITS SERIES C TO PUT AI WORKERS TO WORK ACROSS THE REAL ECONOMY” announcement banner |
| Levity | “Control Tower” product dashboard showing an “Incoming Emails (Daily)” chart and an “Emails processed last 30 days” panel |
| Vooma | “TRUSTED BY INDUSTRY LEADERS OF ALL SIZES” logo band with ArcBest, Echo, Evans, NFI, Sunset, and Kingsgate |
| Cargofive | “Trusted by 200+ Freight Forwarders Globally” |

Trust ranking:

1. Vooma — 66
2. Cargofive — 62
3. Levity — 55
4. Lunavo — 44
5. Happyrobot — 42

[Build proof section](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=lunavo.ai#opt-trust-signals) offers proof-signal selection plus copy and placement guidance for a stronger trust section.

## CTA — 72/100, Fair

This category evaluates whether the primary CTA’s copy, size, verb, and perceived cost earn the click.

![Lunavo CTA capture](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/lunavo.ai.jpg?v=2026-09-22T16%3A03%3A05.13%2B00%3A00)

Our primary CTA is **“Book a meeting.”** The identified problems are:

- The click feels costly because it leads to a sales meeting.
- No payoff is named; the CTA is only a calendar ask.
- The CTA does not echo the headline promise.

CTA ranking:

1. Lunavo — 72
2. Happyrobot — 72
3. Levity — 72
4. Vooma — 68
5. Cargofive — 68

[Rewrite this CTA](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=lunavo.ai#opt-cta-writing) generates primary and secondary CTA options grounded in our offer and visitor objections.

## Mobile web — 78/100, Fair

This category evaluates the phone experience as a first-class experience.

![Mobile web annotations on the Lunavo capture](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/lunavo.ai-mobile.jpg?v=2026-09-22T16%3A03%3A05.13%2B00%3A00)

The mobile findings are:

1. **Six-line body paragraph:** Desktop-length copy crowds the fold and pushes the CTA to the viewport’s bottom edge.
2. **Low-contrast grey text:** Light-grey copy washes out against bright yellow containers, reducing readability at arm’s length.
3. **Duplicate header CTA:** A second **“Book a meeting”** in the navigation pill competes with the hero button and squeezes the logo.

[View mobile fixes](https://www.lazyweb.com/backlog?site=lunavo.ai#opt-mobile-web) converts these findings into a prioritized implementation checklist.

## Information hierarchy — 84/100, Strong

This category asks whether the design helps or inhibits the page’s message.

![Information hierarchy annotations on the Lunavo desktop capture](https://zlfyzdmohcskkucuunmk.supabase.co/storage/v1/object/public/sites/growth-score/site/lunavo.ai.jpg?v=2026-09-22T16%3A03%3A05.13%2B00%3A00)

The findings are:

1. **Mobile subhead over containers:** On mobile, the paragraph overlaps bright yellow containers and legibility drops mid-sentence; the lighter right edge is also visible on desktop.
2. **Proof ticker strip:** Small grey monospace text on a busy truck photo is nearly illegible, reducing the impact of the page’s strongest proof points.
3. **Live-at-forwarders card:** The card floats mid-right outside the scan path without an anchor to the CTA or headline, making the social proof feel secondary.

## Value props — 86/100, Strong

This category evaluates whether the title, subtitle, and hero sell the product’s value.

### Our headline and supporting copy

> **More loads. Same team. Higher margin.**
>
> Monday morning, 7am: hundreds of emails before the day starts. Lunavo intakes the orders, answers the standard questions, drafts the invoices, and hands your team only what really needs a decision.

The report identifies these strengths:

- Outcome-first headline in nine words.
- Vivid 7am inbox scene that addresses the real pain.
- Ticker with hard numbers: **85%** and **11s**.

The improvement opportunities are:

- The stock container photo does not show the product.
- There are no named customers or logos as proof.
- The hard numbers are buried in the ticker rather than placed in the hero.

Value-prop ranking:

1. Lunavo — 86
2. Cargofive — 84
3. Vooma — 68
4. Levity — 66
5. Happyrobot — 52

## Competitors

The report lists these competitors, inferred from product, audience, and value proposition:

| Rank | Company | Site | Growth Score |
|---:|---|---|---:|
| 1 | [Cargofive](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/cargofive.com) | cargofive.com | 74 |
| 2 | Lunavo | — | 73 |
| 3 | [Vooma](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/vooma.com) | vooma.com | 72 |
| 4 | [Levity](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/levity.ai) | levity.ai | 71 |
| 5 | [Happyrobot](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/happyrobot.ai) | happyrobot.ai | 66 |
| — | [Augment](https://www.lazyweb.com/growth-score/site/augustdata.ai) | augustdata.ai | failed |

The report is a Lazyweb Growth Score assessment of the public Lunavo landing page. It evaluates the page’s messaging, calls to action, mobile presentation, information hierarchy, and trust signals; it does not provide Lunavo’s operational performance results.

---

[Read this page’s summary](https://www.lazyweb.com/api/public/v1/page-tldr?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lazyweb.com%2Fyc-f25%2Flunavo&trace=t_bc7e1c4e5b07)

## Ask a follow-up about this page

Need a more specific answer? Ask the exact question you have. It returns a fresh, cited answer from Lazyweb’s knowledge base. No account or API key required.

Open this URL with your own question, URL-encoded. Only q is required. No account or setup.

`GET https://www.lazyweb.com/agent/faq?q={question}&trace=t_bc7e1c4e5b07`

[Tool guide and examples](https://www.lazyweb.com/agent-access) · [OpenAPI](https://www.lazyweb.com/api/public/v1/openapi.json) · [Page TLDR form](https://www.lazyweb.com/agent-tools/page-tldr?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lazyweb.com%2Fyc-f25%2Flunavo). Opening a form does not execute a tool.